Posted on 03/25/2007 5:38:24 PM PDT by Flavius
Tony Blair warned Iran last night that it has only a few days to find a diplomatic solution to the escalating crisis over the 15 missing British sailors and Marines.
As the tension grew, the first direct high-level talks took place between Margaret Beckett, the Foreign Secretary, and Iran's foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to press Britain's concerns.
The moves came as the Foreign Office admitted it had no idea what has happened to the 15 Navy personnel seized by the Iranian military on Friday.
The Prime Minister, in his first public comments since the incident, appeared to signal a hardening of attitudes after more than 48 hours of low-level diplomacy.
Speaking in Berlin, Mr Blair said he still hoped that there could be a diplomatic solution.
"I hope that this is resolved in the next few days," he said. "The quicker it is resolved, the easier it will be for all of us.
"We have certainly sent the message back to them very clearly indeed. They should not be under any doubt at all about how seriously we regard this act, which is unjustified and wrong."
The seizure of the 14 men and one woman by Iran was a "very serious situation", Mr Blair added.
He warned Teheran that it was a "fundamental" issue for Britain and insisted that the personnel had not strayed into Iranian waters.
He said: "I have not been commenting up to now because I want to get it resolved in as easy and diplomatic a way as possible, because it is the welfare of the people that have been taken by the Iranian government that is most important. But this is a very serious situation."
The sailors and Marines were seized from the Shatt al-Arab waterway south of the Iraqi city of Basra. Teheran claimed the patrol encroached on its territorial waters in an act of "blatant aggression".
But this was disputed strongly by Mr Blair. He said: "There is no doubt at all that these people were taken from a boat in Iraqi waters.
"It is simply not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us."
Downing Street sources denied that Mr Blair's comments should be read as an ultimatum to the Iranians or that any sort of military option was under consideration.
But the intervention does mark a shift in the language being used.
Mrs Beckett continued the pressure, "making very clear" in a phone call to Mr Mottaki that no violation of Iranian waters had occurred. And she repeated still unanswered demands for information on the whereabouts of the 15 and for consular access to them.
Britain's position received support from other European Union countries yesterday. President Jacques Chirac of France said Britain had the "complete solidarity" of all EU leaders over the sailors.
"It seems clear they were not in the Iranian zone at the time," he said.
The German presidency of the EU issued a statement calling for their immediate release.
Diplomats are hoping that there may be more movement today from Teheran as Iranians return to work after a public holiday.
Yesterday the British ambassador, Geoffrey Adams, met his counterpart in the Iraqi foreign ministry seeking access to the prisoners.
A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We are waiting to get a response to that. At the Ambassador's request he went to a meeting at the Ministry of Foreign affairs in Teheran to press again for the release of our personnel, ask where they are being held and ask for consular access."
Last night it was reported that Iran may give consular access once an investigation is completed.
Lord Triesman, a Foreign Office minister, said: "We don't know where they are. We wish we did. We are asking whether they are being moved around inside Iran."
The Foreign Office refused to comment on reports that the Iranian military had extracted confessions from the team from the frigate Cornwall, saying this was "speculation".
The team was seized on the eve of Saturday's UN security council vote to impose further sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme
Relations between Britain and Iran have deteriorated recently, partly because of the row over Iran's nuclear programme and partly because of Iraq.
But Foreign Offices sources said Iran was viewing the prisoners and its dispute with the UN as separate issues.
These jokes get lame.
You do realize that the bad guys in all of this are the Iranians, right?
Winston Churchill: "If the country of Iran does not free the forces of the United Kingdom that it is holding captive by 12:00pm local time tomorrow, a state of war will exist between our two countries".
There IS a pattern and it is one of contempt for the administrattion and our allies. The general thrust is to speak contemptuously of them and mock them with "snappy one-liners."
Frankly, I am sick of it, too. I
Thank you Dog, I've been trying to point that out all day. Some people have short memories and totally lack loyalty. The ones bashing Blair are the same guys who where high fiving and saying he had "Big brass ones" just a year or so ago.
More "prudent' than what? That sounds rather similar to "bomb the hell out of Iran," actually.
The leaders of the West? Where in hell are they? Taken over by the politically correct? Do they have balls anymore?
I'd be thinking more along the lines of Grenada.
Right..and words are useless when they are willing to use the sword. Defense is not offence, whether it's in the sphere of diplomacy or war.
I realize quiet well that certain 'tact' must be used at times.. though a 'rescue' is not too realistic a choice.
If this was the mullahs idea.....we'd all better get ready, I'd think.
Has W said anything publically on this? (And before the bashers here turn from Blair to Bush, I have no doubt that Bush is working this behind the scenes as much as Blair is)
Brit Guy, I hope I am wrong. But I dont think Tony Blair has it in him to start what could be a very messy war with Iran. Backing us up yes he has been a strong ally in the WOT. But you have to admit he is reacting exactly like Iran thought he would. Iran wouldnt have considered this if Thatcher was in office especially with Reagan in the Bullpen.
"You do realize that the bad guys in all of this are the Iranians, right?"
Thanks, genius.
You need to be ready to show them, Tony. They consider talk to be cheap, especially coming from the contemptible infidels. They know the West is afraid of widening the ME conflict, and are counting on a diplomatic victory. So far, they are right where they want to be--in charge of events.
You know what this reminds me of....the first days after 9/11....when people were demanding we go after the Taliban and Bin Laden....it is playing out the same way.
I am still of the opinion this was done by a rogue group.
The best way to get them back is "If we have them back by midnight 03-26-07 you live, if not, you mushroom".
Yes, it does. Lots of contempt shown then, too. Same thing about going into Iraq.
Pretty much the same group that were pissing and moaning about us not doing anything in Afghanistan. I'd hate to have any one of them guarding my back, they're as bad as the french.
I wouldn't bet against the SAS pulling off a rescue.
She's with Ronnie and thier banging thier heads against the wall, Come on Tony! Come on Bush! Git er done!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.