Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
If as you Rudyites like to say, "Rudy is the only one who can beat Hillary," then why didn't he run against her for the Senate? Could it be that he didn't actually believe he could win?




He was diagnosed with prostate cancer. Do we have a problem with our memory?
165 posted on 03/25/2007 4:47:15 PM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: KATIE-O
I admire your persistence in the face of overwhelming facts.
173 posted on 03/25/2007 4:52:09 PM PDT by airborne (Airborne! Ranger! Combat Tested Vietnam Veteran! DUNCAN HUNTER !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

To: KATIE-O
Yes, I am aware of his excuse in 2000 about his prostate cancer. However, he wasn't so ill that he had to step down as mayor (which is theoretically more stressful than a senate campaign), so maybe it was just a convenient excuse.

But what I was really talking about was last fall, why didn't he run then? If he had defeated her, she would have been finished politically -- THAT would have been a demonstration of GOP loyalty.

177 posted on 03/25/2007 4:54:14 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson