Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair convenes Cobra team as crisis in Iran escalates
scotsman.com ^ | 25th March 2007 | BRIAN BRADY

Posted on 03/25/2007 5:17:55 AM PDT by Dog

THE official notification, delivered in secure calls yesterday morning to senior Whitehall figures, was the latest dramatic behind-the-scenes move to get to grips with a crisis that is now engulfing the government.

After a day of shadow-boxing with a notoriously slippery regime, Tony Blair is set to up the ante: the plight of the Shatt al-Arab 15 is officially a crisis and he will need the Cobra team to handle it.

The clutch of VIPs will gather in an operations room several floors below Downing Street as early as this afternoon to plot an escape from a military spat that now threatens to become an international incident.

The decision came just 24 hours after the crew of HMS Cornwall had been caught in the confusion of direct confrontation with Iranian vessels in the searing heat of the Gulf.

As the crew members were surrounded in their two rubber dinghies, the Cornwall's commander, Commodore Nick Lambert, frantically radioed back to his own top brass for instructions.

The response to the inquiry, which had been immediately patched through to Ministry of Defence headquarters in Whitehall, was to hold fire.

The order to show restraint has been observed throughout the forces and the British government in the 48 hours since, but it is unclear how long both sides will be able to maintain control.

Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett's first response to the gathering crisis on Friday was to keep to diplomatic conventions. After a hurried phone call to Blair, she immediately summoned Iran's ambassador, Rasoul Movahedian, to her office to explain their behaviour.

After a meeting described by officials as "brisk but polite", Beckett emerged to stress that she was "extremely disturbed" by events.

It was an understated description of the deep concern now gripping the government. Not only was Blair's administration alarmed at the risk to the 15 military personnel, which included at least one woman, but it was in no doubt over Tehran's ability to use their plight to make a wider point.

During a flurry of diplomatic activity in the hours after the snatch, the Iranians' rhetoric repeatedly elevated their action, and the alleged motives of the British, to a multinational affair. It was the eve of a second UN Security Council resolution imposing sanctions over Iran's refusal to halt its programme to enrich uranium. The Shatt al-Arab 15 were, from the start, pawns in a perilous international game.

"It looks like too much of a coincidence," a senior Foreign Office insider confirmed.

The response was a no- nonsense demand for Iran to relent - and Britain freely used the international community to back up its case. Beckett dispatched the UK chargé d'affaires, Kate Smith, to confront the government in Tehran, armed with the insistence that the British sailors had been in Iraqi waters.

In the meantime, Blair made a personal call to European allies, including EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, to secure a public denunciation of the Iranians' actions.

"It was impressed on everyone how important it was to raise the diplomatic temperature, rather than keep a low profile and let them make a song and dance of the situation," one defence official said.

"There is nothing to be gained in provoking a confrontation, because that would be playing into their hands. But neither should we let them have it all their way. We tried that before and we're still trying to get our kit back."

The smaller-scale precedent, the taking of six British marines and two sailors on the same waterway in June 2004, was a painful lesson. The personnel were only returned after they had been paraded blindfold on Iranian television and admitted entering Iranian waters illegally. Three years on, the government is still pressing Iran for the return of its boats and kit, including valuable radar equipment.

The degree of concern felt across Whitehall was demonstrated yesterday, when Movahedian was called back to the Foreign Office, this time to see Beckett's minister, Lord Triesman. The British were clearly attempting to warn off Tehran before it could begin to use the servicemen and women as a significant propaganda tool.

It was, however, a race against time - and through it all, the diplomats and the politicians were acutely aware that Tehran has built a foreign policy on disregarding diplomatic niceties.

Top level COBRA is an acronym for Cabinet Office Briefing Room A, where its meetings are held.

Tony Blair, senior ministers, police and security chiefs all take part. It is called after events such as 9/11, 7/7

and can evoke emergency powers such as suspending Parliament or restricting movement.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; bombirannow; iran; iraq; lambertsfolly; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-447 next last
To: RightWhale

Ahhhh, that's all we in the west have done : talk. You don't TALK to these kooks, military ordinance is all they understand. Too bad they don't love god or their neighbor...


321 posted on 03/25/2007 5:45:44 PM PDT by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Dog


Call the cobra
322 posted on 03/25/2007 5:47:11 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I guess we'll see now what Tony Blair is made of.

I'm guessing, "Sugar and spice and everything nice..."

...and not IRON, like somebody else we all know and love...


323 posted on 03/25/2007 5:55:33 PM PDT by Overseez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

Strong words and the truth. Dittos.


324 posted on 03/25/2007 6:07:58 PM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

In either event, the U.S. holds the bargaining chips (Iranian prisoners) and I doubt we are going to turn them over to Iran for nothing. As harsh as it sounds, they aren't our boys.

Maybe some of the Iranians we hold will end up being part of an eventual deal for the release of the 15 UN sailors, but I guarantee the U.S. will get something out of it.


325 posted on 03/25/2007 6:34:53 PM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: clilly54; antivenom

90% of all oil from the Gulf is transported by tanker through the Strait of Hormuz.


326 posted on 03/25/2007 7:15:29 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (War... it's just a shot away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Dog

the Cornwall's commander/cook, Commodore Nick Lambert, frantically radioed back to his own top brass for instructions.


327 posted on 03/25/2007 7:16:38 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

the Cornwall's commander/cook, Commodore Nick Lambert, frantically radioed back to his own top brass for instructions.


328 posted on 03/25/2007 7:16:39 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

Treason has become a thing of the past in our polite society. At least until the left takes complete control. Then it'll be back with a vengeance.


329 posted on 03/25/2007 7:26:34 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (War... it's just a shot away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: clilly54

absolutely correct..we buy no oil from Iran...we could stop Iran cold if the surrounding countries closed the borders,the US and Britain blocked the tankers in the Straits, and all traffic was halted in and out of Iran, freezing all financial transactions with the outside world..it would take about a week for Iran to crack. But the world is essentially too spineless to do that.


330 posted on 03/25/2007 7:57:49 PM PDT by scoastie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: gonzo; Bulldawg Fan; Grampa Dave; devolve; MeekOneGOP
kharg terminal port information
331 posted on 03/25/2007 8:34:46 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Dog; blam
On another thread about the USS Stennis arriving in the 5th Fleet area, "blam" said:

"My take:
We're not going to attack Iran.

But, a new round of sanctions are about to take effect and it is anticipated that Iran may pull some 'stunt' in the Persian Gulf.

We now have the assets in place to react with overwhelming force if they do."

Prescient?
332 posted on 03/25/2007 9:33:53 PM PDT by compuguru (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

"t has to do with the spine of the administration in charge at the time..."

I agree.


333 posted on 03/25/2007 9:36:55 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: compuguru
"Prescient?"

Perhaps.

Each HOUR that the Brit hostages are held increases the possibility of serious conflict. There will NOT be a 'little' conflict. It's all or none with these freaks.

334 posted on 03/25/2007 9:52:27 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

So did I! What a disappointment.


335 posted on 03/25/2007 9:54:42 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Cobra!!!


336 posted on 03/25/2007 10:10:40 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel ("...Mindless pack of trained Maoist circus seals."-www.iowahwk.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thomas16

"Are you for real, you obviously want world war 3, you mustn't have children that would be eligible for draft in a few years. I just love all this chest pounding."

You must have been that twerp in grade school who kept revising the line, saying "well, I dare you to step over THIS line."


337 posted on 03/25/2007 10:26:06 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

"Now if they were US forces, things would be a lot different. But that's why they picked UK marines. They're playing it safe. Easy target, satisfactory propaganda and humiliation. No fear of retaliation."

Ever hear of the SAS? They are a fearsome group, certainly the equal of the SEALS, slightly different specialties.


338 posted on 03/25/2007 10:31:29 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thomas16

Some things are worth dying for.


339 posted on 03/26/2007 12:56:23 AM PDT by Timbo64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pox

"This went nowhere. The Iranians calculated that the British would not do anything other than talk, and they are correct."

Yep.


340 posted on 03/26/2007 1:01:59 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Veritas. Gravitas. Ohmygas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson