To: dr_lew; txroadkill
"Dude, put down your hash pipe. Take a blow." Enough with the petty smoking insults.
The guy was apparently fired (at least in part) because he held anti-Macroevolutionary views--and showed them. txroadkill simply showed how some of what was presented didn't directly challenge Macroevolution.
29 posted on
03/25/2007 12:35:41 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
The guy was apparently fired (at least in part) because she tried to teach history/sociology (and non-curriculum history/sociology at that) in a biology class - in her first week on the job.
31 posted on
03/25/2007 12:50:02 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Red Meat. We were meant to eat it" - Sam Neill for Meat and Livestock Australia)
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
The guy was apparently fired (at least in part) because he held anti-Macroevolutionary views--and showed them. But isn't eugenics microevolutionary? I believe the distinction is made only for the purpose of admitting that "microevolution" does take place. Then if eugenicists want to practice artificial microevolution, how is this it that this is an outrage against anti-Macroevolutionary views?
32 posted on
03/25/2007 12:59:47 AM PDT by
dr_lew
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson