Replies

"Creationists' religious beliefs seemingly do not lead to accurate scientific predictions. You want an example? Where is the evidence for a global flood ca. 4300 years ago? If you can't provide scientific evidence for a global flood at that approximate date, all the rest of creationist belief separates from scientific data and theory. If such a major claim, with absolute worldwide ramifications, can't be supported, there go the tower of Babel and lesser claims. What else will fail the test? Genesis? DNA and other studies have contraindicated that too." - Coyoteman

Religious Creationism is not Intelligent Design. God didn't make a pig manufacture human growth hormone, but that pig was created via intelligent intervention.

Confusing the two is fodder for simpletons.

What is this thing you have for pigs?

I provided you a stark challenge to creationists' religious beliefs and you're back riding your pet pig.

What about the supposed flood? What about the silly tower of Babel story. Can't stick to one subject?

"I provided you a stark challenge to creationists' religious beliefs and you're back riding your pet pig. What about the supposed flood? What about the silly tower of Babel story. Can't stick to one subject?" - Coyoteman

You are having difficulty grasping that the intelligent design and creation, by Man, of a pig that produces human growth hormone, is *not* a religious matter.

Ergo, you are having difficulty grasping the fact that Intelligent Design is not a religious theory.

This leads to the obvious conclusion that this scientific debate is over your head and beyond your educational reach.