[MHalblaub]

"That's incorrect. The author is showing in his math the *probability* for a sequence of data. You can apply that math to many fields/areas, such as to the sequence of codons that form DNA."

I didn't question the author's math. I doubt his input data.

"Since DNA has sequenced codons, the author's math holds true even though he wasn't there circa 3 billin years ago for the first DNA life form."

So you just guessed that life started with DNA? Why not with RNA? Why do you think it was always a tri-nucleotide sequences code? How can you justify your assumption? What are the most simple living chemical reactions?

What is the possibility for adenine, cytosine, guanine or Thymine? Never read about that anywhere. Is it just to simple to calculate it so everybody knows the answer?


But from the point on when life started you can't apply the author's simple math. Life went on with evolutionary algorithms.

[Southack]

"So you just guessed that life started with DNA? Why not with RNA? Why do you think it was always a tri-nucleotide sequences code? How can you justify your assumption? What are the most simple living chemical reactions?" - MHalblaub

It's not a guess; it's a stopgap used for mere convenience until you provide something better (e.g. the precise minimum number of sequenced codons for the most basic possible life to exist).

The math in question works for *sequencing*, by the way, so DNA and RNA sequencing are both covered.

"What is the possibility for adenine, cytosine, guanine or Thymine? Never read about that anywhere. Is it just to simple to calculate it so everybody knows the answer?" - MHalblaub

You should read Rasmussen's abiogenegis experiments. They're well funded and very professional (and performed by Evolutionists!).

[Southack]

"But from the point on when life started you can't apply the author's simple math. Life went on with evolutionary algorithms."

Utter nonsense. You can *absolutely* apply the author's "simple" (in quotes because you can't show better) math to sequencing RNA and DNA genetic data.

...and how "life went on" is clearly by Design in the case of modern gentically altered animals such as pigs that make human growth hormone.