Posted on 03/24/2007 1:03:12 PM PDT by veronica
Former U.S. Rep. Bill Zeliff is joining Rudy Giulianis presidential campaign.
A source in the campaign told UnionLeader.com that the former Jackson innkeeper will help with federal and New Hampshire issues as an adviser and will help raise money in Washington, D.C.
Zeliff, a Republican, was first elected to New Hampshires 1st District U.S. House seat in 1990. He left the House after three terms and ran unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination for governor in 1996.
Zeliff has been a Washington lobbyist for the past 10 years, currently employed by The Livingston Group, headed by former Republican Rep. Bob Livingston of Lousiana.
Bingo!
Please link to newspaper articles. If they think those pictures make this a 'tranny' site, they are more stupid than the Rudybots who think the pictures are offensive.
While I might not rule out a divorced candidate, for the values voters, there's a party out there with single marriage candidates.
And when it comes time to pick a cabinet, theyve got depth.
Couple of Reverends in there and even a big city mayor. The choice should be an easy one when confronted with Rudy-Newt-McCain. One wife short of a baseball team.
I didn't save them and I know of one article/link that was deleted. But we've talked about them on and off for weeks so they're around here somewhere.
Don't be so coy. You've been incessantly posting the sourceless charge.
LOL! Exactly! That's why if a newspaper really said that, which I doubt, then they are using the same logic.
Stern said his former boss's tendency to take no prisoners and suffer no fools reminds him of another New Yorker running for the White House: Hillary Rodham Clinton."Both Rudy and Hillary are not apologists or apologisers," Stern said, "and I think ultimately that comes out as a strength."
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2088565,00.html
The last time a thread about it was linked, it was pulled. And I'm not going to look for the others because I really don't care if you believe it or not.
It's been talked about pretty extensively on some of the Rudy threads where we've laughed about it.
How convenient.
Don't hold your breath waiting for the imaginary articles to be sourced.
Yes, I thought it was quite convenient that management decided to pull the articles/threads and those posting them were warned not to do so again.
Now, if I'd been management, I'd have given a different kind of warning but hey, that's just me.
The Village Voice loves you!http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0709,savage,75915,24.html
Q-I read your column faithfully every week in the Orlando Weekly. But I need to ask two things. What does the abbreviation GGG stand for? And what was the Web site that you mentioned a while ago for men to meet transsexuals? A Faithful Fan
A-GGG stands for good, giving, and game, which is what we should all strive to be for our sex partners. Think good in bed, giving equal time and equal pleasure, and game for anythingwithin reason. And that tranny Web site I mentioned was, I believe, freerepublic.com.
Q: I read your column faithfully every week. But I need to ask two things. What does the abbreviation "GGG" stand for? And what was the website that you mentioned a while ago for men to meet transsexuals? A FAITHFUL READERA: GGG stands for "good, giving, and game," which is what we should all strive to be for our sex partners. Think "good in bed," "giving equal time and equal pleasure," and "game for anythingwithin reason." And that tranny website I mentioned was, I believe, freerepublic.com.
I doubt he was seriously suggesting FR is a transexual site, rather commenting on the level of political discourse, which when it comes to Rudy, frequently obsesses on on sexuality.
Crossdressing, his marriages, the impact of his cancer on his sex life, various religious based slanders, beastiality, all the serious issues that "true conservatives" base their decisions on.
Keep weaving your tangled web.
You might want to re-think your specious little charge. But then it was made by a specious little man.
BTW, you're being noticed. The Village Voice loves you!http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0709,savage,75915,24.html
Q-I read your column faithfully every week in the Orlando Weekly. But I need to ask two things. What does the abbreviation GGG stand for? And what was the Web site that you mentioned a while ago for men to meet transsexuals? A Faithful Fan
A-GGG stands for good, giving, and game, which is what we should all strive to be for our sex partners. Think good in bed, giving equal time and equal pleasure, and game for anythingwithin reason. And that tranny Web site I mentioned was, I believe, freerepublic.com.
If you want to know whay Giuliani's private life raises major problems for Republicans, both short and long-term, here are a couple selections from hardcore liberals that came out this week. I chose not to post them because of where they came from, but they're instructive of what will be coming.
From flaming lib Froma Harrop we have the following:
I'm hardly the first to note that the Republican Party alleged keeper of family values has as its two presidential favorites men with checkered marital careers. Indeed, the leader in the polls, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, holds the most dismal domestic record of any human being who has ever seriously run for president. Yet he remains immensely popular among social conservatives.
Could it be that 95 percent of the culture war was just a pretense to impeach Bill Clinton and tar Democrats?
...Land really has no choice. If the "family values" coalition can live with this behavior, then it's out of business. Link
This from the esteemed Bill O'Reilly stand up guy Rev. Al Sharpton:
"I'm not one that ever got into his personal life, but clearly I think that when you run for president it would be examined," said Sharpton. "Especially since the Republicans raised it so much with Bill Clinton." Link
Other leftwingers have stated that the nomination of Giuliani will be the end of the pro-life movement as a political force. Nominating Giuliani strips the GOP of the ability to be the "traditional values" party and that is a loss that it cannot sustain.
You are reading far into this one. The hundreds of threads with all the "endorsements" are ridiculous. This one is "Former Contressman Backs Giuliani". If you had bothered to read the actual thread, it was a joke mocking the trivial endorsements being posted.
I really don't know why I am bothering to respond to you. You are jumping to weird conclusions and attempting to call it slander. Be careful of your wild baseless charges here. Again, if you even bothered to read what I wrote, I said "I'm waiting for a post with a headline, "Former Hooker Endorses Giuliani". Where is that a slander? And of whom?
The thing I don't understand is this...
Knowing Rudy's background, most conservative women wouldn't consider dating him because they couldn't trust him. But....they would vote for him to be President? I don't get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.