Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: volunbeer

Until they get within 10km they are going subsonic. Why can't they be detected and shot down before then?


31 posted on 03/24/2007 10:49:07 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans

They could be detected and shot down over long distances but that assumes 100% efficiency on our part. If our carrier was in the gulf or other tight confines (for a carrier) and a barrage of 50 or more of these things were launched I am not optimistic we could shoot them all down before they hit the fleet. If they used several submarines they could probably get one or more within the envelope.

In the barrage scenario we have to be right 50 times and they only have to be right once. This was the Russian strategy to deal with our carriers using lots of long range bombers and submarines launching multiple missiles.

The cost comparison is ridiculously cheap for the other side compared to the cost of our carriers, crew, and aircraft on board.

The best defense for a carrier is lots of open water but as you get further from the area of operations you decrease the effectiveness of your attack aircraft (time on target and fewer sorties). Our strategy to protect our carriers should constantly evolve and be a top priority for the Navy.

The loss of even one carrier would be a devastating blow to our psyche as much as our ability to prosecute a war. That is especially true in our present political climate where the democrats would be more likely to play the blame game and direct their anger towards the President than towards our foes.


39 posted on 03/24/2007 11:22:20 AM PDT by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Dan Evans; volunbeer; ThunderStruck94
For T94, how would the Iranians target a carrier? Launching a sophisticated missile is one thing, but assuming the task group is way over the horizon, how do they know where the carrier is?

For the Ruskies I suppose satellites would be used, so did I answer my own question?

Should we assume that an attack by Iranians required Russian targeting assistance?
46 posted on 03/24/2007 1:41:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats prefer our troops bleed rather than win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson