Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

Okay, that sounds about right. This one is twisted a lot tighter by the present international climate.


152 posted on 03/23/2007 8:40:10 AM PDT by RightWhale (Treaty rules;commerce droolz; Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

Ooops, I think it was 2005. In any case, it could be the Iranians are relying on the same thing to happen in this case (no military response, that is). The reasonable assumption is that it will be just another staged diplomatic incident that ends quietly, with only a bit of humiliation for the West (apparently at a level we find acceptable), and a propaganda boost to Iran's image of being powerful. And it gets Ahmanutjob off the hook from having to be present in the US and appear at the UN.


154 posted on 03/23/2007 8:45:40 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson