Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranians Seize British Sailors
ABC GMA | ABC GMA

Posted on 03/23/2007 4:30:15 AM PDT by MindBender26

Just saw in 7:00-7:30 segment of GMA.

Iranian navy siezed about a dozen UK sailors. Sailors were conducting routine shipping embargo inspection in northern end of Persian Gulf.

Sailors have been taken back to Iran

Can't find it anywhere else.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bitishsailors; britishsailors; geopolitics; iran; iraq; muhammadsminions; shattalarab; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 next last
To: Pox

It is a delicate situation. But the Iranians have also seized U.S. personnel in the past. What does that tell you of their 'respect' for the U.S.? The Iranians are opportunists full-stop. They have had a lot of success in embarassing Western states in the past (e.g: U.S. Embassy incident). But they'll be smart enough not to push their luck in the current climate. Last time they seized some U.K personnel (and briefly U.S. on another occasion)these were released quickly in this regard. The UK government will never release prisoners in exchange for these men (just see the UK and US condemnation of the Italian capitulation in Afghanistan recently).


241 posted on 03/23/2007 4:42:48 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: uksupport1

The key words were "in the past". Try that shit with us now and you know that we will eliminate their naval forces and begin a war with Iran while we are planted on 2 of their borders.

The last incident you refer to was in 2003 and it's obvious our priorities were elsewhere, but this time around it simply gives us the excuse we need to put their regime out of business permanently.


242 posted on 03/23/2007 4:50:02 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Knitting A Conundrum; All

Map at post # 612 :

News From the Long War, Thread 3
Various | 3/19/07 | Knitting a Conundrum and Others


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1803557/posts


243 posted on 03/23/2007 5:44:32 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

It's a nice, easy to read useful map...


244 posted on 03/23/2007 6:13:15 PM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Iran's smart. They know that the UK won't do anything physical to rescue them or retaliate. Blair is so politically weak, he can't do a thing.


245 posted on 03/23/2007 6:14:29 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
This is an act of war against the UK. Time for the US/UK to bomb these bastards to hell.

Ain't gonna happen. No balls there, no balls here. The balls have left the stadiums.

246 posted on 03/23/2007 6:15:10 PM PDT by b4its2late (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

What's the feeling about this in the UK now? Are people angry? Apathetic?


247 posted on 03/23/2007 6:16:21 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Is there a British website like Free Republic where we can give the parents of these men some support?


248 posted on 03/23/2007 6:22:13 PM PDT by huldah1776 (Worthy is the Lamb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; MoochPooch; Michael81Dus; Vicomte13; az_gila; Experiment 6-2-6; henkster; ...
Europe pinglist

If you want on or off the list, go to the link for instructions. Otherwise, it won't be guaranteed that you will be put on or taken off (it still won't be 100% guaranteed, anyway, but will be much more highly probable).

249 posted on 03/23/2007 6:27:51 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
FNC was in spots (a commercial break) and some old friends still toil at ABC.... were I got my network start in 1964! (Arrrg!)

If that's what you're going with, well then, O.K.

Did you see what Rosie said on the view today?


Just hav'n a little fun.

250 posted on 03/23/2007 6:50:42 PM PDT by uptoolate (If it sounds absurd, 51% chance it was sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jeffers

ping


251 posted on 03/23/2007 7:00:35 PM PDT by bwteim (bwteim = begin with the end in mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

I think the U.S. and U.K. are less prepared now for war with Iran than they were in the period in 2003. We're stuck in a brutal insurgency. Iran has been able to dip its finger into this because they, like the rest of the world, know that we're unable to do much about this interference. Given the internal divisions in the U.S. (Democratic majority in both congress and the senate) and the wider international community and the overstretched nature of our armed forces, escalation on our side is not a viable option beyond limited gestures. Furthermore, the Iranian military could swamp Coalition forces in Iraq by weight of numbers if it came to a sudden war. Undoutedly Iran would lose heavily, but not before making the already poor situation in Iraq even worse. If we toppled Ahmadinejad would we be able to fight against Islamic insurgents in that country too?


252 posted on 03/23/2007 7:31:26 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: uksupport1

Nonsense. You do not seem to understand the concepts of modern war. Not only are we able to take out Iran under current circumstances, it would actually begin to ease the problematic areas in Iraq that are receiving significant aid from Iran, and Syria would be put upon immediately to reign in their support for the Iraqi insurgency or face annihilation after the loss of their primary supporter.

Iran would have no control whatsoever of their airspace if we go to war, and that would spell doom for their ground forces, support lines, etc. Any type of 'swarm' would be rendered combat ineffective before it could reach their border with Iraq. About the best they could do is wreak some havoc on shipping but that would be more or less a temporary thing.

IMO, there would never be as significant an insurgency in Iran due to it's different makeup compared to Iran. Also, an insurgency in Iran would need support not just from locals but from exterior supporters and Iran would be basically isolated from any exterior support for resistance.

The premise of OIF was to induce the problem governments in the ME to begin a transition towards a more modern type of government based upon current western models. The hope is to do this with a minimum of bloodshed, but as many of us expected, most of the dictatorial regimes are not going down without a fight. There best opportunity was to attack us while we were prepping to attack Iraq, but since Pakistan wimped out they knew there was no chance to defeat us and would simply have hastened their own demise.


253 posted on 03/23/2007 7:49:58 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

bump to read later


254 posted on 03/23/2007 8:02:50 PM PDT by AprilfromTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci

Yes, ask someone from Argentina who remembers 1982 and the Falklands Islands War, and they know how much Maggie meant business.


255 posted on 03/23/2007 8:24:27 PM PDT by jragan2001 (NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: uksupport1

If we toppled Ahmadinejad would we be able to fight against Islamic insurgents in that country too?
___________________________________________________

I see no reason for a ground battle or drawn out occupation of Iran.

If we attack the 7th century Mullah's from above ... that alone may light a fire in the Iranian people that they have no chance of putting out. I know... "yeah, right". We're dealing with Islamic fruitcakes.


256 posted on 03/23/2007 8:44:46 PM PDT by open mind-closed fist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

They're only boghammars. Motor boats. Theyre very small and fast, difficult to track.


257 posted on 03/24/2007 1:24:42 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

> I agree the aussies and poland would help. The rest of the EU is bloody useless.

Australia is not, to the best of my knowledge, a member of the EU.


258 posted on 03/24/2007 1:31:30 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

> I do believe that even if the Iranians were to decapitate these sailors...

I think Iran might find that easier said than done. British Sailors aren't exactly journalists or meek peace-loving humanitarian volunteers. They thrive on a bit of bovver and a spot of biffo and definitely don't like to wear orange jumpsuits. They enjoy warfare and are rather good at it -- have been for hundreds of years.

Capturing a dozen British Sailors is about as smart a move as taking a dozen Texas Rangers hostage, or keeping wolvarines as pets.

Someone in Tehran has made a dreadful mistake.


259 posted on 03/24/2007 1:44:50 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Mr.Imanutjob was coming to New York for a UN speech. But later cancelled, after the high seas piracy. I'd wish he had not cancelled, so we could throw his sorry ass in jail until the 15 sailors are set free.
260 posted on 03/24/2007 3:35:20 AM PDT by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson