Posted on 03/22/2007 5:03:31 AM PDT by Alia
Blue State Digital was founded by four Howard Dean supporters:
History of Blue State Digital
In the final months of Howard Dean's Presidential Campaign in 2003-04, Jascha Franklin Hodge, Clay Johnson, Ben Self and Joe Rospars -- four principals of Dean's Internet Team -- conceived of Blue State Digital. As leaders of a campaign that made history for its innovative use of the Internet, the four wanted to continue developing best practices for online communications, fundraising, organizing, and technology. So, on March 5th, 2004, the four founded Blue State Digital.
About two years later, Blue State Digital operates offices in Washington, D.C., Boston and Los Angeles, employs a team of twenty-five and has worked with more than sixty clients including: national and state Democratic parties, international political organizations, political action committees, environmental advocacy groups, progressive think tanks, online communities, news organizations and campaigns of every size.
Pass the popcorn!
Seriously, the incredible popularity of this video shows how utterly stupid the Campaign Finance Reform Act is. The only thing I hold against Fred Thompson is that he supported it. I am pleased that he's said he's rethinking it and now believes that it should be replaced by a law that simply requires all contributions from every source be immediately posted online. I also think ithe law should forbid all foreign campaign contributions (something the 527 loophole permits). Even so, the wildfire spread of YouTube campaign propaganda like the Clinton 1984 shows that it is going to be very hard to track the producers of these videos and that voters will just have to be more discerning.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
All of whom should stay far away from Fort Marcy Park.
OTOH, I do agree that saying "avoid Ft. Marcy Park" cuts to the quick with the message, "Look out! You could be next" (on the Clinton list).
HF
Didn't Hillary! say that this was from the VRWC?
Worst
excerption
ever!
Okay, I did not read anything that said they ctreated it.
Perhaps a more sane use of the excerpt rule is in order.
Who the hell made it?
What are you, an idiot?
Some dumbass Liberal staffers carried a dead body out of the White House in a rug and none of the permanent White House staff or security or the media saw it?
Okay.
You wanna try again?
No, I'm not an idiot. I live in the Washington area and I used to work by the White House. If the deed were done, it was at 1 or 2 a.m. There isn't much traffic on the streets of Washington, and there's no media presence outside the White House. If they ran a van in, they could get him out without much notice.
Okay.
/eyeroll
Pretty darned short - could have just posted the whole thing, it was so short. Just wanted to highlight that Howard Dean's people were involved.
You read it all and you still can't figure out who made it?
Yep.
I remember when it was being debated.
Numerous commentators pointed out that, because the law would cut off (soft) money normally spent by the national political parties, those funds would instead flow to and be spent by narrower and less accountable special interests: EXACTLY what happened.
This "unintended" consequence was obvious, predictable and actually predicted, dozens if not hundreds of times over. But McStain et al were too dumb to see it. Heck, McStain was too dumb -- or too full of hubris -- to see it even after the fact. Why else would he have spent the whole 2004 election cycle complaining about the 527's as if they were someone else's fault?
This ad wasn't even orginal, it was first used against Liebrman by a Ned Lament supporter.
This one was much more professional, though.
Fascinating, I didn't know this.
From your link:***
Could the intrigue over Phil de Vellis' controversial anti-Hillary video become more a question of some copy-cat work? Former Plain Dealer Cincinnati bureau chief Bill Sloat presents the goods in his Daily Bellwether blog.
It seems that the anti-Clinton video created by de Vellis, a political operative who once worked in Sherrod Brown's Senate campaign, is pretty much a carbon copy of a video that Ned Lamont supporters (specifically, ME) put out last year in their unsuccessful attempt to take down Sen. Joe Lieberman. Check out that video here.
Now compare it with de Vellis' work here.
Most of the content is lifted from an Apple Computers ad. But de Vellis was not the first guy to use it for political purposes (though perhaps he was the first to lose his job over it). "Such amazing creativity," notes Sloat's site. "Or is it plagiarism?"
I tend to lean towards plagiarism myself, but I'll wait and see what develops before I make any definitive judgement.
I wasn't paying attention, I read Bill Sloat's blog from time to time. As an Ohio blogger I try to keep up.
Here is the poorly produced original
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1O63aHyqDQ
From the post
"Another veteran of Ohio Democratic politics, Tim Tagaris, worked for the Lamont campaign in 2006 and pointed out the existence of Adams' work. And there's more from Bob. It looks like Ohio really is the heart of it all.]"
My take: Sherrod Brown's campaign blogger ripped off the ad, maybe alerted to it by Tim Tagaris.
Looks like more might break on this story tomorrow.
According to this lefty Ohio commie blogger
http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/03/22/vote-different-more-coming/
The lefty blogs in Ohio are going nuts. hehehe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.