Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom DeLay Looks Back
NY Times ^ | 21 MARCH 2007 | Editorial

Posted on 03/21/2007 5:17:13 AM PDT by rdb3

The New York Times

Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By


March 21, 2007
Editorial

Tom DeLay Looks Back

Since his forced retreat from power in a corruption scandal, Tom DeLay, the former House Republican majority leader, must have been watching re-runs of “Cool Hand Luke.” That film’s cynical rationalization of life’s conflicts as merely a “failure to communicate” is Mr. DeLay’s approach to explaining the Republicans’ loss of Congress last year.

No, no, he insists in a new memoir, it wasn’t voters revolting against the quid pro quo corruption that Mr. DeLay turned into a dark art. Rather, Republicans “did not communicate their message” and overcome “short-term, media-fed issues.”

Despite Mr. DeLay’s retreat from public office after his indictment for political money laundering, the memoir is, of course, entitled “No Retreat, No Surrender.” Mr. DeLay excoriates former colleagues from Newt Gingrich to the leader of the moribund House ethics committee that finally found the temerity to admonish him. He is furious that Republicans didn’t back his attempt to stay in power after his indictment.


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: delay; slimes

1 posted on 03/21/2007 5:17:15 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
No, no, he insists in a new memoir, it wasn’t voters revolting against the quid pro quo corruption that Mr. DeLay turned into a dark art. Rather, Republicans “did not communicate their message” and overcome “short-term, media-fed issues.”

The NYT explanation isn't any better than DeLay's. We lost because we spent money like drunken sailors, are allowing an invasion from the south, and pay little more than lip service (if that) to conservative ideology.

It wasn't corruption in the terms the NYT wants us to think, and it wasn't a failure to "communicate their message." The message got communicated; it just wasn't the one that the Republicans tried to lie us into believing.

2 posted on 03/21/2007 5:23:09 AM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Occasionally, truth peeks through. At one point, Mr. DeLay does allow that voters faced “a general perception of Republican incompetence and lack of principles.” Well, at least that got communicated, Mr. Former Leader.

Whoa! Getting spiteful.

I do agree that the constant drumbeat by the DBM and Democrats about DeLay and Foley did cement in the minds of many voters that Republicans were unprincipled.

Of course, there were the scandals of "Freezer Stash" William Jefferson (D-LA) and Sandy Burgler, but they were barely talked about.

3 posted on 03/21/2007 5:33:39 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
If you persist in omitting the mandatory "Barf Alert" for NYT drivel, your posting privileges will be permanently revoked.

You have been warned!

</sarcasm>

4 posted on 03/21/2007 5:39:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sir, yes sir!


5 posted on 03/21/2007 5:42:44 AM PDT by rdb3 (Poor fella. He has no idea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson