Replies

I've looked at a lot of of the Hunter videos on youtube. Hunter, with his permanent scowl and slovenly appearance, isn't the guy the make the sale to the American people.

Communicating ideas is part of reality. We need a candidate that can make the sell about the need to stop Revolutionary Islamists before they spike nukes over our side the net. Bush is not a good communicator, and people at home and abroad are really confused about America's motives. This has left the floor open for progressive demagogues, and saying "I'm against stemcell research and Michael Schiavo" isn't going to turn things around.

If I was only voting for people based on how closely they agreed with myself, hell, I would just vote for myself! But you have to look at what is in the best interests of the Republic over the long term.

In all actuality, Fred Thompson isn't exactly smiley face! And I do recommend people check out Duncan Hunter because no one exudes more leadership than that fine man and he can just cut right to a point and speak common sense that strikes to the issue. You're trying to win people over to the 'actor', I'm trying to get people to check out Duncan Hunter. I think more people that actually take a look at Hunter will come to the opposite view of your's. I think that's your bias showing with 'electability'. I'll tell you, outside the GOP fawning over the 'actor', the only people who would really know who he is are people who watch Law and Order. He isn't so big a name or as assured 'electabillity' as some would like to claim. He will eventually face the military question. The GOP is going to have to have a solid messenger on Iraq and the WOT and Hunter is the MOST qualified and MOST capable in that area. And I prefer a man more in the mold of John Wayne with actual military experience and the strength of character and leadership like Hunter.