Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PACIFIC POWER PLAY
New York Post ^ | 19 MARCH 2007 | PETER BROOKES

Posted on 03/19/2007 8:12:38 PM PDT by rdb3

New York Post

PACIFIC POWER PLAY

By PETER BROOKES

March 19, 2007 -- RECENT military news out of China includes double trouble. First, Beijing an nounced a jaw-dropping 18 percent jump in its defense budget - 5 percentage points more than last year's alarming rise -at the yearly meeting of the National People's Congress.

On top of that came news from an unidentified Chinese admiral via a Hong Kong newspaper that China is pretty far along in aircraft-carrier R&D - and could have one in the water by 2010.

This isn't good news.

The existence of a Chinese "flattop" program has long been rumored. Sure, some military experts scoff at the idea - often pointing out that carriers don't fit with China's military doctrine of "asymmetry."

That is, China's military buildup has focused on developing capabilities that are best suited to take advantage of an opponent's weaknesses - rather than one of trying to counter its obvious strengths.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: buildup; china; military; sino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2007 8:12:39 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"On top of that came news from an unidentified Chinese admiral via a Hong Kong newspaper that China is pretty far along in aircraft-carrier R&D - and could have one in the water by 2010."

I've heard that this was a Magic Chinese Admiral.

2 posted on 03/19/2007 8:15:16 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

And only ONE candidate takes the chicoms seriously. Duncan Hunter


3 posted on 03/19/2007 8:15:51 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is it possible to have a substantive discussion anymore without trying to tout your candidate?


4 posted on 03/19/2007 8:21:23 PM PDT by mgstarr (People shouldn't fear their government, governments should fear their people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr; pissant

Mgstarr, can you inform us how your candidate views the chicoms?


5 posted on 03/19/2007 8:23:52 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

We can have a serious discussion. Hunter is dead serious about this.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1803529/posts

As am I. I buy nothing from the commies. Wish more people did the same.


6 posted on 03/19/2007 8:27:18 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

No, cause nobody else has mentioned it.


7 posted on 03/19/2007 8:27:51 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr; Enterprise

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28q0qxsrX6E


8 posted on 03/19/2007 8:28:41 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

well this was inevitable...we'll just have to adapt


9 posted on 03/19/2007 8:31:09 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Find out what brand the Ethiopians are drinking and send a case to all my generals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

This thread needs your links


10 posted on 03/19/2007 8:33:31 PM PDT by Ronin (Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Oh, those loveable pesky Chicoms. Remember this?

"Tuesday May 25, 12:02 AM
Chi-com Clinton Donor Behind Threat to Nuke L.A."

(By now, Hillary is probably thinking of telling Hollywood that they better damned well stop Obamamania or else she will have a talk with her Chinese friends.)

Clinton's Chinese nukie buddies

11 posted on 03/19/2007 8:36:04 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Oh the Clintons are in the chicoms pocket. Mercifully, no GOPer that I'm aware of is. They just don't like to grab the bull by the balls like Hunter does.


12 posted on 03/19/2007 8:37:19 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I hope the same. And I hope that any GOPer DOES NOT FORGET the prior threat by the Chinese!


13 posted on 03/19/2007 8:39:31 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Well, they'll all be forced to address it with Hunter in the room. He's not going away.


14 posted on 03/19/2007 8:42:18 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, they'll all be forced to address it with Hunter in the room. He's not going away."

At least not willingly.


15 posted on 03/19/2007 8:54:43 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: philetus

Or unwillingly. He's committed and when he announced, it was not to announce that he would announce on some announcement date.


16 posted on 03/19/2007 8:56:45 PM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
China is pretty far along in aircraft-carrier R&D - and could have one in the water by 2010. This isn't good news. Pffft...ONE carrier in the water by 2010? And it's their first one. The chinese build crap as far as military hardware goes, their stuff is a cheap rip-off of junk that doesn't work well anyway. (russian) Any naval or air confrontation in that neighborhood will result in the Chinese getting their ass handed to them. Wake me up in 20 years when they've got a viable, proven carrier group.
17 posted on 03/19/2007 9:00:28 PM PDT by Bozworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"and could have one in the water by 2010"

...And if we so desired, we could have it under the water in just a fraction of the time it took for them to build the thing.

18 posted on 03/19/2007 9:08:41 PM PDT by KoRn (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Our trade with Red Commie China allows them to increase their military spending. We are enabling a billion person enemy to expand, intimidate, and conquor.

And some politicians think trade with red commmie China is good for America? We are being sold out folks.


19 posted on 03/19/2007 9:09:16 PM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

He could be a real threat to the Dems and that is dangerous.


20 posted on 03/19/2007 9:10:52 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson