Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Seeking Gonzales Replacements
politico.com ^ | March 19, 2007 | By: Mike Allen

Posted on 03/19/2007 4:41:26 PM PDT by Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 461-463 next last
To: BigSkyFreeper
Thanks for your spot-on posts on Rush. Exactly what I wanted to say, only better.
301 posted on 03/19/2007 6:16:36 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Dog

I wouldn't be shocked if this were true. The Bush administration has often been quick to fly the white flag when the Demonrats are enraged.


302 posted on 03/19/2007 6:20:24 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemike
Is there some type of "Wormwood/Snake-tongue" Presidential Aid whispering into his ear at night??

Laura?

303 posted on 03/19/2007 6:20:37 PM PDT by nfldgirl (ALL AMERICAN YOUNG FEMALE FREEPER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; devolve; ntnychik
The lights are on at 1600--but is it a timer.

And wimpishness has caused them to lose their glow...!

304 posted on 03/19/2007 6:21:20 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What did Kyl say?


305 posted on 03/19/2007 6:21:42 PM PDT by McGavin999 ("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
but this just emboldens the enemy,...err..democraps.

A distinction without a difference.
306 posted on 03/19/2007 6:22:30 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

I just want you to know, I really appreciate your comments on this thread.

Thank you.


307 posted on 03/19/2007 6:24:05 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Maybe US Attorney Sutton has earned high enough marks with his successfully prosecuting those protecting our borders that he will get the nod to replace 'Berto.

If Bush had any sense he'd throw Sutton under the bus, demand a REAL trial for the Border Guards, and say that Sutton was that naughty Gonzales's protege (true).

The two problems with that scenario are 1) Sutton is also an old pal of Bush and 2) both Sutton and Gonzales were following Bush's "vision" on the border thingie.

Still, given what we've seen of Bush "loyalty"...

308 posted on 03/19/2007 6:25:34 PM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Good riddance to Gonzales. He "apologized", and there's nothing the scumbag rats like more. The rats will prey on that kind of weakness like vultures on a carcass.


309 posted on 03/19/2007 6:26:05 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Yeah. You're probably right.

Just like Rumsfeld.
310 posted on 03/19/2007 6:26:29 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I have given Bush as much support as he has given this unique Republic. As I watched our national sovereignty vanish and our standing in the world fade I am ashamed I voted for the sorry bugger.


311 posted on 03/19/2007 6:27:25 PM PDT by B4Ranch (You're in America now. Here we speak English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Suffice it to say he didn't give Gonzales much support; weasel words is what I took away from it.


312 posted on 03/19/2007 6:27:42 PM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
but I'm sick of seeing him grab his ankles.

Well that was his position all last week in south america and mexico, so I guess he enjoys it.

313 posted on 03/19/2007 6:27:48 PM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

"SecDef Rumsfeld (a great SecDef) was not fired"

yes he was a great sec. of defense. And when someone is as great as he was, he should not have been replaced. I believe, he should have stayed on. But that is just my opinion.


314 posted on 03/19/2007 6:28:24 PM PDT by PaRepub07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Don't try to pretty it up, just say it: borders. Your main issue.


315 posted on 03/19/2007 6:28:55 PM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Dog
..if true this makes the WH seem weak

But since we're throwing names around, try this one:

Victoria Toensing

316 posted on 03/19/2007 6:37:05 PM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Oh yes. Don't get me started with the Dubai Ports stuff.

On the other hand, Bush made enough bona fide mistakes with personnel that it was really hard to "trust" him with a Supreme Court nominee, especially when we had so many good people.

But we shouldn't have undercut him on Dubai Ports. They are one of our best allies in the Middle east, and we treated them like Crap so that Schumer could make the democrats look strong on terror (undercutting our own party distinction) AND give the port work to his own cronies.


317 posted on 03/19/2007 6:37:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Brown really screwed the President on Katrina.


318 posted on 03/19/2007 6:38:21 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Not surprised.


319 posted on 03/19/2007 6:38:26 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaRepub07
yes he was a great sec. of defense. And when someone is as great as he was, he should not have been replaced. I believe, he should have stayed on. But that is just my opinion.

Well then, all he more reason why "true" conservatives should not have acted like spoiled brats and understood the consequences of staying home last election (while we were at war!) over a few domestic issues.

SecDef Rumsfeld put the good of the U.S. soldier above himself...and agreed leaving was the best option to make sure we kept on the offensive.

320 posted on 03/19/2007 6:38:32 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 461-463 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson