Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani backtracks on smoking comment (smoke Nazi)
TCM ^ | 9/19/03 | staff

Posted on 03/19/2007 10:22:16 AM PDT by pissant

A day after he implied that Ireland should not follow New York City’s example and pass a ban on smoking in all workplaces, Rudolph Giuliani called Mayor Michael Bloomberg to say that was not what he meant.

Bloomberg said the former mayor told him that he meant that Ireland, which currently has no smoking restrictions, should begin to restrict smoking slowly, rather than all at once.

“He just thought that sometimes you go partways to get there, let people adjust and then go the rest of the way,” Bloomberg said yesterday.

Giuliani said that it made more sense to restrict smoking to certain areas.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; giuliani; nannystate; pufflist; rudy; smoking; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last
To: dirtboy
Ah, so you get to impose your views on other smokers, eh?

I couldn't give a rat's a$$ about other smokers.

41 posted on 03/19/2007 10:58:36 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind
"I am thankful that my state passed strict smoking laws, it helped me quit."

So you needed the state to pass a law so you could quit?

And you think because you wanted to quit, others do to?

"All smokers want to quit, they just don't all admit it. "

No. It's more like....

"I'm just a liberal, but I just don't want to admit it"
42 posted on 03/19/2007 10:58:56 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

"It was glorious freedom!!!"

No, freedom is what business owners used to have before nanny state lovers like you started taking away their freedom in the name of your convenience.


43 posted on 03/19/2007 10:59:13 AM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I would not either, especially if the law mandates fines (not a nice way to treat your fellow citizens). The more Rudy opens his mouth, the less I'm inclined to vote for him as well.


44 posted on 03/19/2007 10:59:31 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind
I couldn't give a rat's a$$ about other smokers.

Yeah, who cares if a bar wanted to be open to smokers, and you would be free to not go to it? As long as you have your way. Who cares about property rights?

The more I learn about the attitudes of Rudy and those who support him, the more opposed I get to him.

45 posted on 03/19/2007 11:00:37 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And they say Mitt Romney's back-spinning is out of control??? Hah!


46 posted on 03/19/2007 11:00:48 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

See post #41.


47 posted on 03/19/2007 11:00:55 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind
I am thankful that my state passed strict smoking laws, it helped me quit.

What a weakling. Take responsibility for your own actions.

All smokers want to quit, they just don't all admit it.

BS. I have no desire to quit.

48 posted on 03/19/2007 11:01:02 AM PDT by TigersEye (For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind
You could have always done that, you could have quit on your own, they way I did, many years ago, you could go to dinner at a restaurant that doesn't allow smoking as part of their policy not the states. There is never a reason to pass restrictive laws on a LEGAL activity. Either outlaw smoking, or leave it up to the property owners to decide. Any other way is unconstitutional.

Don't believe smoking bans for private property are unconstitutional? Then you are indeed a liberal and a true nanny stater. Rudy will never get my vote, either in the primary or the general election.

49 posted on 03/19/2007 11:01:40 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

They might also try:
3.) Explain that Rudy would never act on his principles on this matter if he was President.


50 posted on 03/19/2007 11:01:55 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth; All

---"My town passed a no smoking law.

This is the first St Patrick's Day that my friends and I were able to go out to the bars, watch the game clearly, wear what we wanted without dry cleaning and not have to shower the smoke stench off of us before we went to bed.

It was glorious freedom!!!"---

Yeah, now if they could just ban alcohol, too. Then we'd be free of the booze smell and the drunks, as well as the cigarette smell in bars.


51 posted on 03/19/2007 11:02:31 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"... defines irony."

You beat me by 13 minutes!

We shed our blood to be independent of a government that taxed and regulated us to death. We risked it all to win the freedom to choose for ourselves. Something that basic is lost on some people.

52 posted on 03/19/2007 11:02:53 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Freedom is not having to stink like you.


53 posted on 03/19/2007 11:03:28 AM PDT by Rita Hayworth (There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pissant

At first I figured it was good natured debate on the primary issues...

But I'm starting to get a sick feeling in my stomach now that people are PAYING staffers to post and have 'official representatives' on Free Republic.. and the subsequent spread out attacks on the various campaigns.

I had come to expect more from some of you...


54 posted on 03/19/2007 11:03:36 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/clean_indoor_air_act/employers.htm

What are the penalties?

The enforcement officer for a city or county health department can assess a penalty of up to $1,000 for each violation. In areas where the State Health Department is the enforcement officer, a fine of up to $2,000 may be assessed.


55 posted on 03/19/2007 11:05:14 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
OK, allow me to re-phrase this: All smokers with half a brain want to quit. There.
56 posted on 03/19/2007 11:05:45 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pissant
“He just thought that sometimes you go partways to get there, let people adjust and then go the rest of the way,”

Maybe Bloomberg was misquoting Rudy, but if not ... that statement is beyond scary.

57 posted on 03/19/2007 11:05:59 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind


Why that's mighty 'judgemental' of you..

'Rights for me, but not for thee'?

Seems so.


58 posted on 03/19/2007 11:06:46 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

And I worked downtown this past St. Patrick's Day. My husband advised me to be careful going home with drunks on the road. St. Patrick's Day is one of the top drunk-diving days. Maybe they should have banned alochol first.


59 posted on 03/19/2007 11:07:32 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
"Kindly speak for yourself and not others."

What can we expect from someone who cedes his freedom of choice to government, who permits authoritarian parent figures to force him to choose what he lacks the will to choose for himself? Of course he's going to assume that everybody must want what he wants and should be forced to have it.

60 posted on 03/19/2007 11:08:34 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-390 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson