Skip to comments.
Museum Officials Oust Research Associate Open to Intelligent Design Theory (Smithsonian)
Concerned Women for America ^
| 3/13/07
| Cara Cook
Posted on 03/18/2007 11:10:07 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Scientists at the Smithsonian have created an environment of fear, where well-published biologists who disagree with the establishment may face demotion and harassment if they voice their views. Politically-driven scientists who claim to work on behalf of intellectual freedom would do well to grant their opposition a right to be heard, and to attack arguments instead of persons.The left's main desire is to destroy America's Judeo-Christian heritage.
1
posted on
03/18/2007 11:10:10 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
2
posted on
03/18/2007 11:10:49 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
I have seen that same thing right here in Free Republic. Just cast any shadow on Darwinism and feel their wrath.
3
posted on
03/18/2007 11:13:00 AM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
To: wagglebee
The left's main desire is to destroy America's Judeo-Christian heritage. Agree 100%.
4
posted on
03/18/2007 11:13:13 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: wagglebee
And now we understand why those scientists that argued the world wasn't flat and the sun didn't revolve around the earth were persecuted.
To: wagglebee; editor-surveyor; DaveLoneRanger
6
posted on
03/18/2007 11:16:06 AM PDT
by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: wagglebee
This is the same tax payer institution who would NOT let Ollie North's "War Stories" film crew photograph the Enola Gay.
Why? The "rights" for commercial uses were sold to the Showtime Network.
7
posted on
03/18/2007 11:16:55 AM PDT
by
llevrok
(When illegals are the majority, can we citizens open up casinos ?)
To: wagglebee
This nothing to do with liberals. It about a non-scientific nut-job of an idea trying to pose as science.
8
posted on
03/18/2007 11:16:57 AM PDT
by
Rudder
To: sgtbono2002
I have seen that same thing right here in Free Republic. Just cast any shadow on Darwinism and feel their wrath. Or simply questions why members of a conservative forum are supporting a liberal for the Republican presidential nomination.
9
posted on
03/18/2007 11:22:32 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
"a distinguished evolutionary biologist with two doctorates in biology."
"Sternberg has two PhDs; the first from 1995 in molecular evolution from Florida International University, and a second in systems science from Binghamton University."[Google to wikipedia]
Neither of these are scientific powerhouses, the last time I checked. And the description of his career, as provided there, does not make him sound anything like "distinguished". Just another behe.
10
posted on
03/18/2007 11:25:37 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: wagglebee
Good thing he didn't mention doubts about Gorebal warming. He'd have death threats to worry about, too.
11
posted on
03/18/2007 11:27:39 AM PDT
by
magslinger
(Submission? That's a bit of a problem!)
To: GSlob
Okay, then why did the Smithsonian hire this "undistinguished" biologist in the first place? Keep in mind that they have their choice of most of the top researchers in the world, they obviously thought he was worth hiring then.
12
posted on
03/18/2007 11:29:19 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Rudder; wagglebee
Dr. Sternbergs sin was to allow a scientific article critical of neo-Darwinism to be published in a biology journal It would be interesting to know if this journal was in anyway associated with the Smithsonian.
If not I do not see where the Smithsonian officials have any gripe.
13
posted on
03/18/2007 11:30:02 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
To: wagglebee
"But scientists and their servants are losing credibility as it is being revealed that too many of them put ideology and politics above their reputed goals, Loosing? They lost it long ago, and are underlining that fact with this latest global warming nonsense.
To: Rudder
"It about a non-scientific nut-job of an idea trying to pose as science."
Scientists once said the earth was flat.
To: sgtbono2002
I have seen that same thing right here in Free Republic. Just cast any shadow on Darwinism and feel their wrath.
But FReepers don't fire you from your job or make your life unlivable. We may however be a bit "spirited" in discourse, but that is what debate is for. We come and go from this forum freely.
To: sgtbono2002
I have seen that same thing right here in Free Republic. Just cast any shadow on Darwinism and feel their wrathThe same goes for "global warming".
The liberals are harboring a bunch of what I call "protected theories" that will not stand up to scientific scrutiny and so, no one is allowed to submit them to scientific scrutiny.
The politically correct gag rule has been invoked and the range of our "blinders" is again narrowed.
17
posted on
03/18/2007 11:34:51 AM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
To: GSlob
As if "wikipedia" is a reliable source of information.
To: wagglebee
"He did post-doctoral work between 1999 and 2001 at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution and in 2001 became an unpaid research associate there.[1]"-from that same wiki article on him.
Working without pay is not being "hired". He did his post-doc'ing there, and then was kept around without pay, probably as a charity gesture till they could unload him on somebody else. I have seen a load of such situations.
19
posted on
03/18/2007 11:36:16 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Nathan Zachary
"As if "wikipedia" is a reliable source of information." - it is good enough for the biographies of living persons - too high a risk to be caught with a lie.
20
posted on
03/18/2007 11:37:45 AM PDT
by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson