Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Or, I'm guessing, those who clearly annunciate them, but you don't agree with their views. Bush's objective is to turn two hostile states in the muslim world into domocratic allies, which he has done. The purpose for staying after the toppling of the hostile regimes is to give those allied gov'ts the ability to stand on their own two feet.

Reasoned arguments can be made that it is bad policy, but you cannot convince me the objective is not clear.


115 posted on 03/16/2007 7:58:08 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: pissant
Your point might be valid with regard to Afghanistan, and perhaps even in terms of our relationship to Pakistan -- but not with regard to Iraq.

Since this administration had every intention of invading Iraq long before 9/11, its relationship to some nebulous "war on terror" has never really been objectively established at all.

148 posted on 03/18/2007 8:18:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson