Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ASA Vet; Coyoteman
> Some of the comments on this thread indicate Dr. Hawking should have put the < /s > tag after that "quip."

Well of COURSE he was being, if not sarcastic, then challenging. What credible cosmologist or astrophysicist dares speculate about the events (if such a word could apply) that preceded the Big Bang? Naturally, none -- since science can't go there. The mathematics does not allow it.

What then to do? Hawking's quip points out that a belief in God grants one the ability to not only ask the unanswerable question "What came before?", but to propose an answer, albeit an unscientific one.

The fact that the answer ("God") is essentially untestable and unfalsifiable makes it unacceptable science. But that's the point. Science stops at the Big Bang like a fly against a brick wall. If one chooses to do so, one can then consider the possibility that God is on the "other side" of that wall (yes I realize that metaphor is untenable).

Given the opportunity, I would ask Hawking whether he personally believes in God as a Prime Mover. If you know of any statement of his on that topic, I'd be appreciative of a link.

26 posted on 03/14/2007 10:15:12 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
For God to be "God", he must by definition, exist outside the laws of our Universe. So the fact that God is scientifically untestable is PROOF of his existence, not doubt.
36 posted on 03/15/2007 1:32:43 AM PDT by Verax ("Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated - Planned Parenthood President,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson