[TomGuy]

you are one of those third party voters who gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton

No!

Bush 1 gave you Bill Clinton, because Bush 1 ran one of the sorriest re-election campaigns in history.

Bush 2 may have you Hillary Clinton, because of his policies and procedures and his thumbing his nose at the base who put him in the White House and kept him their in 04.

Notice the correlations: Bush Clinton Bush Clinton. And recall that GW called Bill his new brother (making Hillary his new sister) and BillyJ and George HW are almost inseparable.

[investigateworld]

Bingo!

And to understand why, read "Compromised, Bush - Clinton - Cocaine", By Terry Reed and John Cummings.

Yes, the Bots will come a screaming, but I know what I know that corroborates Reed's statements.

(Plus I have some documentation I'm saving for when sinkspur comes back ;^0)

[Vigilanteman]

My own theory is that the Bushes and Clintons are in cahoots. After 4-8 years of Hitlery's misrule, the sheeple will look back on the present with nostalgia and it will be Jeb's turn. Twenty years rule by two royal families is more than enough, we need a Clinton/Bush break in 2008.

[The_Eaglet]

Bush 2 may have you Hillary Clinton, because of his policies and procedures and his thumbing his nose at the base who put him in the White House and kept him their in 04.

Notice the correlations: Bush Clinton Bush Clinton. And recall that GW called Bill his new brother (making Hillary his new sister) and BillyJ and George HW are almost inseparable.

Outspending the Clinton adminstration isn't exacty a testimony of fiscal conservativism either, and as of 2006 there were no Democrat majorities to blame.