To: SWAMPSNIPER; Liberty Valance
"nominate Rudy and watch me go fishing."
Exactly. I would rather take my chances with a Clinton presidency than a Rudy presidency. If Rudy is president he is the head of the Republican party. If Rudy is president we have no voice. I will not be a lick-spittle for a lousy RINO.
49 posted on
03/13/2007 5:42:04 PM PDT by
Brucifer
(JF'n Kerry- "That's not just a paper cut, it's a Purple Heart!")
To: Brucifer
That's true. A Clinton presidency would be horrendous, but at least we would still have a voice. With Guiliani, he will be head of the Republican Party, and in turn he will swing the party left. There is no need for two parties left of center.
I know that many social conservatives are not going to support a social liberal like Rudy. As a Dem told me, if Rudy wins, they call it a "moral victory".
What have you won if you compromised everything you've stood for?
50 posted on
03/13/2007 8:03:08 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
To: Brucifer
Wow Brucifer, you just threw a rather large turd in the RINO for President punchbowl. But don't worry, someone will be along shortly to shine that turd up to a gleaming, glowing sheen.
![](http://www.elmspuzzles.com/gallery/Moon/gonefishingl.jpg)
51 posted on
03/13/2007 8:24:40 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(theconservativecandidate@still2early.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson