1 posted on
03/12/2007 6:25:08 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
03/12/2007 6:26:45 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
I opt for Intelligent Design - we never had short legs!
3 posted on
03/12/2007 6:26:53 PM PDT by
Ken522
To: blam
So, how does it relate to the trousers worn with the belt just above the knees?
4 posted on
03/12/2007 6:27:14 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: blam
Violence has more to do with what is between our ears than how long our legs are.
5 posted on
03/12/2007 6:29:38 PM PDT by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: blam
a squat physique and stance helped the males fight over access to females This is the sort of thing that drives me crazy. Did they find a fossilized motivation? Squat physique helped them fight? Maybe so. What did they fight over? Women? Bananas? Oysters? Who knows? Let's all make a wild guess and call it science.
6 posted on
03/12/2007 6:30:05 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: blam
Does this mean the french have long legs that enable them to run away faster?
8 posted on
03/12/2007 6:33:28 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
To: blam
An article yesterday said they also liked big butts. Short legged women with big butts. Works for me.
9 posted on
03/12/2007 6:34:52 PM PDT by
devane617
(Let's take back our country -- get a job in the MSM, or education system. We need you.)
To: blam
Devolution ... we're publishing skeletal gorilla porn trying to explain why men ... never mind.
11 posted on
03/12/2007 6:45:52 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: blam
12 posted on
03/12/2007 6:48:01 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(for those in Rio Linda, there's conservapedia)
To: blam
Wow look at those very tiny feet.
I wonder how many of these finds are actually built up composites of many creatures. IOW the researcher could be led astray by what he wants to find.
I mean, it is not like that has never happened in this area of science.
13 posted on
03/12/2007 6:53:49 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: blam
"If they were more aggressive than modern humans, they were exceptionally nasty animals." I'll put some FReepers up to that test... *\;-)
15 posted on
03/12/2007 6:56:46 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: blam
Thanks for posting. Recently I've been wondering about
Short PeopleJ
16 posted on
03/12/2007 6:59:38 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: blam
I'm glad you found details about YOUR ancestors; I am very happy for you. Mine were created by God; in his own image.
17 posted on
03/12/2007 7:00:26 PM PDT by
gedeon3
To: blam
|
Yo! Dobie! Yeah you - you're lucky I'm on this leash!!! |
21 posted on
03/12/2007 7:10:03 PM PDT by
Hoplite
To: blam
The very first line is a lie. It should read: Ape like monkey ancestors .... Not ape like "human" ancestors. There is absolutely no proof that this animal was a direct ancestor of humans. My tag line says it all.
22 posted on
03/12/2007 7:16:34 PM PDT by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: Bacon Man
So THAT's why Wild Bill is built like that!
Those of you who don't know my stepdad, I gotta tell you . . . he's taller than me (so over 5'10"), and his legs are noticeably shorter than mine. I mean, WAY shorter, like you wonder what happened to his legs, and then you realize he had to have been born that way since he's almost six feet.`
24 posted on
03/12/2007 7:22:00 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(It's a Zen thing, you know, like how many babies fit in a tire.)
To: blam
Howard Dean...
Short legs and nasty...
To: blam
I thought we had short legs for loving. Well, half of us, at least.
35 posted on
03/12/2007 7:55:58 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich!)
To: blam
Nevertheless, male-male competition doesn't fully explain human violence, Carrier says, noting other factors such as hunting, competing with other species, defending territory and other resources, and feeding and protecting offspring. Why did you leave out bitching, nagging, redicule, and adultry. These are far more commonplace pressures.
42 posted on
03/12/2007 8:11:31 PM PDT by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
To: blam
I'm not sure I agree with the notion that short legs make a body more stable for fighting. In fact, the more I think about it, the more I think it's just the opposite.
Picture two cameras, each sitting on its own tripod, and both sitting at the same height. But one tripod has long legs and a short neck (or whatever you call that extendable verticle pole that the camera sits on), the other has short legs and a long neck.
Which camera is less likely to get knocked over? I say the one sitting on the long legged tripod. Longer legs allow for more triangularity and therefore more stability.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson