Have y'all signed?
Posted on 03/11/2007 6:03:56 PM PDT by buccaneer81
U.S. prosecution of border guards is a baffling miscarriage of justice Saturday, March 10, 2007
The Associated Press article "Border-shooting case shrouded in confusion," Feb. 17, omitted many facts from the trial transcripts and Department of Homeland Security memos.
The government prosecuted Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean criminally for acts that called only for an administrative reprimand, based the case on the testimony of an admitted drug smuggler brought back from Mexico and induced to testify by a grant of immunity, withheld crucial evidence from the jury, used the wrong law (which carries a mandatory additional 10-year sentence), and held the transcript of the trial, without which the border guards cannot appeal, for 11 months. The smuggler’s reward for his testimony was immunity, U.S. medical treatment and a government-issued border pass.
Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security now admits that its official lied to congressmen in claiming that Ramos and Compean had confessed, lied, destroyed evidence and said they did not believe the smuggler was a threat. No evidence ever existed for those damaging accusations.
The government denied their freedom pending appeal and put Ramos in a prison where five illegal immigrants were alleged to have severely beaten him and kicked him with steel-toed work boots. Reportedly, no prison guards defended him from this attack.
The prosecutor, U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton of San Antonio, claims that Ramos shot an unarmed drug smuggler in the rear end as he was running away. But the ballistics report failed to prove the bullet came from Ramos’ gun, and the medical report showed that the bullet entered the smuggler’s buttocks on his side at an angle consistent with Ramos’ contention that the smuggler was turning around with what looked like a weapon in his hand.
Ramos and Compean didn’t believe they wounded the smuggler because he kept running and escaped across the border into a waiting vehicle. The doctor’s description of the trajectory of the bullet he removed from the smuggler’s body casts doubt on the whole assumption that his wound came from shots fired by the border guards.
Sutton claims that Ramos and Compean were prosecuted because they lied and covered up their actions. The alleged lie was that they gave an incomplete report of their confrontation with the smuggler on Feb. 17, 2005.
But a recently released Homeland Security memo dated May 15, 2005, shows that the two border guards did give a prompt, complete oral report to supervisors, who were present at the Feb. 17, 2005, event. The supervisors decided not to make a written report.
Failing to make a written report isn’t a crime. It is merely a violation of a Department of Homeland Security memo stating that the penalty is merely internal disciplinary action, which is not criminal prosecution.
The big question is, why didn’t the government prosecute the drug smuggler and give immunity to the border guards, who had good service records, instead of vice versa? The smuggler admitted his illegal-drug project to an Immigration Control and Border Patrol agent before Sutton gave him immunity, and the prosecutor did not bother to investigate this drug smuggling by checking the cell phone left in the smuggler’s van or by ordering a fingerprint search of the van until a month after it entered the United States, and even then he didn’t have it done by the FBI.
A few days before the Ramos-Compean trial began on Oct. 17, 2005, the same drug smuggler was caught bringing in a second van loaded with nearly 1,000 pounds of illegal drugs, but he was not arrested, so as not to interfere with his role as star witness against the border guards. To preserve the smuggler’s credibility, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone in El Paso, Texas, sealed the record about the second van so it could not be mentioned at the trial, and she put the families of the defendants under a gag order not to discuss it.
The judge also kept from the jury the smuggler’s confession that he and his friends had considered a "hunting party" to go shoot some U.S. Border Patrol agents.
The failure to release a transcript of the trial one year after the trial took place is an outrage that prevents Ramos and Compean from starting their appeal. Nor has any hearing been scheduled on the assertion by three jurors that they were coerced by the jury foreman to vote for a guilty verdict.
The longer President Bush waits to remedy this injustice perpetrated by his two appointees, Sutton and Cardone, the more he convinces the public that the answer to our bafflement about this prosecution is that Bush administration policy is to intimidate the Border Patrol from stopping the entry of illegal immigrants and illegal drugs.
TERRY T. MAGYAR
Gahanna
I happened to see our local paper last week (i don't buy it) and it contained one above the fold headline on illegal immigration and 3 lesser illegal immigration stories inside.
As far as I know Rudy G and John McCain are still sitting out the first debate. That's what's so infuriating about this election cycle, the front runners are trying to get elected without ever answering any questions.
Yes.
Two Rino shysters if there ever were. The MSM loves them.
All we have left is Fred Thompson.
Response. No it isn't.
A man with his head up his a-- cannot hear so I've been told.
The prosecution of officials on the front lines of the border is nothing more than intimidation.
The next agent will think twice about enforcing the law.
Now in America.....Doing the right thing costs plenty. Doing the wrong thing has many a reward.
Remember my fellow Americans, the majority of the money is always on the dark side.
Even if Ramos and Compean are pardoned, a clear message has already been sent to all Border Patrol agents: protect your a$$ before you protect the border.
Exactly. Best to just look the other way, and count the days until the pension kicks in.
Tons and tons of money floating around from illegal narcotics is bound to influence politics somewhere. Nobody ever talks about it.
Fred Thompson was one of the Republican senators that voted AGAINST impeachment of Bill Clinton. No cajones! Just another RHINO.
Baffling to whom? Certainly not conservatives who are pissed at this administration.This nonsense comes from the top.
Not baffling at all.
These good men are being sacrificed on the altar of globalism, with the tacit (if not direct) approval of the Bush administraton, which aims for nothing less than the elimination of our borders.
They serve also as an example to other agents who might still want to do their jobs.
I don't think so, I believe Johnny Sutton was appointed by George W. Bush.
About three replies back, I was thinking the same thing. Don't remember [I'd know it if I saw it] what his stanch, tag-teaming, partner-in-crime called himself, but I know we haven't heard from either one in a long while.
It isn't baffling to anyone who has paid attention to Bush on the issue of the borders. The President once had my full support. He no longer has it thanks to his wildly liberal stance on the borders.
I suspect the reason is simply that these illegals are having taxes deducted from their pay checks and yet drawing much less from the corrupt federal government. (Which also suggests that all this talk of "amnesty" is largely only lip service).
Sutton is the prosecutor
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.