To: wouldntbprudent
If a majority of Republican voters want someone other than Rudy as the nominee, why hasn't that candidate caught fire yet?
The fact it's still slightly less than 20 months before the election is a good reason.
103 posted on
03/11/2007 5:27:03 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Man50D
It's half that. It's 10 months to the Iowa Caucuses.
To: Man50D
no it's 10 months to the Iowa Caucus and 11 months to the Feb 5 primaries in many many states....the nominee will be know by the middle of Feb or at the latest the 1st of March...
118 posted on
03/11/2007 5:37:28 PM PDT by
texicali
(those that can do! Rudy does in spades)
To: Man50D
"The fact it's still slightly less than 20 months before the election ..."
That I agree with completely. Way tool early to make decision. I want to hear them all. Then I'll decide. I'd simply like evryone to take two steps back, put away the machetes and the scythes, and chill. Let's look at the candiates honestly and then make up our mind.
If our candidate is not nominated, imho, it is incumbent upon us, because we do love our country and recognize the dangers that we face should we have a Defeatocrat as President, to unite behind the candidate.
I take a very dim view of those who threaten to vote Turd Party or threaten to stay home. That is the political equivalent of a 4 year old having a tantrum.
120 posted on
03/11/2007 5:38:22 PM PDT by
sofaman
("The price of greatness is responsibility." Sir Winston Churchill.)
To: Man50D
The fact it's still slightly less than 20 months before the election is a good reason.
We'll know the GOP candidate by Feb.5 or early Mar of next year at the latest. Then the campaign will begin to take shape for the general.
123 posted on
03/11/2007 5:43:29 PM PDT by
deport
( Cue Spooky Music...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson