Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Sen. Baker pushes Fred Thompson for president (Thompson supported McCain)
Scripps News ^ | March 9, 2007 | RICHARD POWELSON

Posted on 03/10/2007 5:04:29 PM PST by FairOpinion

Former Senate Republican leader Howard Baker said Friday he is urging his friend Fred Thompson, a TV actor and former U.S. senator, to run for president and is encouraging others to draft him.

Among potential complications in a Thompson race is that he is good friends with McCain, a current presidential candidate. Thompson endorsed McCain for president in his 2000 bid.

Baker said his wife, former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker, R-Kan., already supports McCain for president and Baker said he too might back McCain if Thompson does not run.

(Excerpt) Read more at scrippsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: baker; conservatives; duncanhunter; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; giuliani; howardbaker; mccain; nixon; runfredrun; thompson; watergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: Reagan Man; restornu

"Nixon was a crook."


===

I see you are dutyfully spouting the Dem talking points, while having the temerity of using a screen name invoking Reagan and claiming to be a conservative.


41 posted on 03/10/2007 5:50:53 PM PST by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I know I sat through those hearing from Det to NYC.

Yikes! I voted for McGoven....

The time when creepy Kerry was in Det. I lived by Wayne state U. so much hate for the Vietnam war/Soldiers etc. it was crazy I moved to NY and became a Republican......


42 posted on 03/10/2007 5:51:09 PM PST by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Thanks. I saw that last week.


43 posted on 03/10/2007 5:51:16 PM PST by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I don't need to read my history I lived throuh it!

There was a lot of good things about Nixon he also has class he resign to save the country from being torn apart not like the Clintons who were also behind doing Nixon in!


44 posted on 03/10/2007 5:55:48 PM PST by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Alright I've had enough. I've got my asbestos underwear on because I'll no doubt get flamed beyond recognition but give me a break. Duncan Hunter is a good man but he's got about as much chance of winning as I do.

One chooses the most conservative person with a realistic chance of winning the nomination and the election. You DH diehards joust with windmills if you must, I'll work for a viable choice and let the Don Quixotes waist their time and efforts chasing ghost turds.


45 posted on 03/10/2007 5:56:16 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
If it's McCain
I abstain.
46 posted on 03/10/2007 5:57:28 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

you are totally wrong. look at the FR poll for starters. Fred is the unity candidate in the Republican party. there are no other conservatives in the race who can win and no other Republican candidates except for Rudy who have legitimate national appeal at this time. add the baggage factor and Fred is alone. The most convincing comments I am seeing (besides at FR) can be summarized as "a republican I can vote for vs. a candidate to run against the democrats". that says it all.


47 posted on 03/10/2007 5:57:52 PM PST by APRPEH (id theft info available on my profile page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"But it's going to be tough on Duncan Hunter if Thompson runs." Your concern is quite ... touching.

No need to start with the divide and conquer business just yet; Thompson hasn't declared. His entanglement with McCain and this Baker endorsement aren't exactly going to endear him to Hunter supporters.

But, the hint of star quality and name recognition do appear very threatening to Giuliani supporters.

48 posted on 03/10/2007 5:58:52 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Giuliani on the Issues

==========

Fred Thomspson on the Issues

======

Hillary on the Issues:


49 posted on 03/10/2007 5:58:53 PM PST by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I swear some of you people are insane beyond belief.

No matter who runs there is some clown car of Freepers that is ready to find ANYTHING to push as a reason not to vote of candidate X. Of course the candidate they support is as pure as the sun is bright.

Sweet Christ, I dont give a damn that Thompson supported McCain in 2000! The issue is what he believes and that alone.


50 posted on 03/10/2007 5:59:09 PM PST by VanDeKoik (Have a bit of humor today. You wont be able to stand this crap for 15 minutes if you dont!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I supported Nixon in 68&72. Where were you? Nixon was caught red handed lying about his involvement in the Watergate affair, you crud.

And you are a liberal supporting the liberal Rudy Giuliani in 2008.

You have no conservative credentials whatsoever, mister liberal!


51 posted on 03/10/2007 5:59:21 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
How quickly the so-called conservatives will stab their conservative guy (Duncan Hunter) in the back for a TV Star.,

I like Hunter just fine. Tancredo, too. But name the last time a House member got his party's nomination?

We have to be pragmatic here. I think Thompson can beat any of the current 'Rats running. Mitt? No. McCain? Too unpredictable. Rudy? Hell, my governor (Strickland, a 'Rat) is more conservative.

Thompson can do the populist thing while having more smarts than Hitlery and Hussein Obama.

In 1979 the Dems and the media laughed at Reagan, too.

52 posted on 03/10/2007 6:00:02 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Right now I go with the candidate who has the best chance of beating the Democrats. At the moment, there's no one better than RUDY. Sure, he's far from perfect, but I'll take him to protect me from the Islamofacists more than anyone else, so far.


53 posted on 03/10/2007 6:00:48 PM PST by Gracey (Rudy/Rice..... 2008 vs Hitlary/Osama Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

"But it's going to be tough on Duncan Hunter if Thompson runs."

Thompson/Hunter ticket then. I think Hunter is 52.
What we are looking for is the best electable conservative candidate. I don't think that candidate is Rudy McRomney.

I don't think I'd gag voting for Thompson.


54 posted on 03/10/2007 6:01:27 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

"I'll work for a viable choice "

Very sensible. I agree completely.

That's why I am supporting Rudy -- he is a leader, which is what we need during the war against terrorists AND he can beat Hillary. President Hillary would destoy the country.


55 posted on 03/10/2007 6:02:54 PM PST by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Hunter was at CPAC last week, up against Romney & Rudy. He only got a few votes among the MOST conservative group of groups. I was surprised. He has no spunk. He couldn't energize the crowd even though he gave a wonderful speech.


56 posted on 03/10/2007 6:03:56 PM PST by Gracey (Rudy/Rice..... 2008 vs Hitlary/Osama Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

I guess little things like your choice may result in President Hillary is of no concer to you?


57 posted on 03/10/2007 6:04:08 PM PST by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Gracey

Sorry--there are too many photos of Rudy in drag. I wouldn't vote for him in the primaries for any reason. The man would be an indignity to the Oval Office. [Now--would I vote for him if Hillary! were his opponent? I'd have to hold my nose and do it, because Hillary! would be an even worse indignity.]


58 posted on 03/10/2007 6:04:25 PM PST by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

" dont give a damn that Thompson supported McCain in 2000! The issue is what he believes"


Helloooo! The issues one believes in IS REFLECTED in whom one supports. Anyone who supported McCain against Bush in 2000 demonstrated exactly what they believe in.


59 posted on 03/10/2007 6:05:58 PM PST by FairOpinion (Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Hey, I agree, Rudy has lots of baggage. Yes, he's been in drag, and I'm much more "conseervative" than he. However, my concern, and I believe also, those at CPAC have TERRORISM on the mind.

This is not a normal type election. I don't forget all the positive things Rudy did for NYC. Besides cleaning up the town, he cut welfare in half or more, and required anyone on welfare to work 20 hours a week. He's a bit ruthless in many ways, and perhaps that's what we need at this time. We have serious problems in the world. I'm with you thought, the Dems will keep marching out the photo's of Rudy in drag. Hey, it might bring over a few of the liberal states that we need.


60 posted on 03/10/2007 6:09:01 PM PST by Gracey (Rudy/Rice..... 2008 vs Hitlary/Osama Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson