Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Examples of [Liberal] Bias in Wikipedia
http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia ^

Posted on 03/10/2007 6:53:37 AM PST by truthfinder9

The site lists 34 examples. Not all, but most, show liberal bias.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservapedia; liberalbias; media; wikipedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2007 6:53:39 AM PST by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

I don't care what kind of bias is there. Wikipedia, as a whole, is an unreliable source of information, particularly for use by children--which is my concern.


2 posted on 03/10/2007 6:56:22 AM PST by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Any idiot can post to Wikipedia. And many liberal idiots use it for their own purposes.


3 posted on 03/10/2007 6:57:23 AM PST by TommyDale (What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

The first example is just silly. BCE is the common parlance today.


4 posted on 03/10/2007 6:58:21 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Wikipedia is for quick cultural information. On that score it excels It's not for hard core historical-economic analysis.


5 posted on 03/10/2007 7:00:34 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Isn't Widipedia open source? I've use it as an easy starting point for research, but it should never be cited as an authoritative source, IMO.


6 posted on 03/10/2007 7:05:04 AM PST by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
There's liberal bias ALL OVER Wikipedia, 34 articles are just a proverbial drop in the bucket.

Wikipedia isn't so great for political/country or religious topics, and for the former, especially those things about the United States.

7 posted on 03/10/2007 7:05:22 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
I've come to use Wikipedia to find useful links at the bottom of each entry to actual information sources.
8 posted on 03/10/2007 7:06:36 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

This from a site that has a disclaimer warning students and researchers about citing information from their site. I believe a few grad students have been burned by Wikipedia.


9 posted on 03/10/2007 7:06:47 AM PST by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

BCE bugs the crap out of me and I only ever hear it coming out of the mouths of smug professor-types, usually on the History Channel, and almost always with a British accent - even if the guy using it is from Texas or Brazil or somewhere that has nothing to do with England.


10 posted on 03/10/2007 7:07:37 AM PST by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Borges

What do you consider "cultural information?" Personally, would consider it very bad for cultural information. It is decent for easily objective topics, such as chemical compounds and and the metric and British measuring systems.


11 posted on 03/10/2007 7:07:42 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Conservapedia
12 posted on 03/10/2007 7:13:01 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (make peace with your Ann, Whatever you conceive her to be: hairy thunderer or cosmic muffin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9

Wikipedia is whatever you make it to be


13 posted on 03/10/2007 7:13:47 AM PST by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That's a very good idea.


14 posted on 03/10/2007 7:18:20 AM PST by Clara Lou (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

I first thought BCE looked like a British title.

One time a liberal said the nicest thing anyone ever said to me. She told me I wasn't very politically correct.


15 posted on 03/10/2007 7:19:17 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Pages like these...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_musical_works_in_unusual_time_signatures

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_Electoral_College_margin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_Weekend_Special
16 posted on 03/10/2007 7:19:33 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Appreciated.


17 posted on 03/10/2007 7:20:20 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DManA

BCE is just silly - no matter how often it's used.


18 posted on 03/10/2007 7:20:41 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (a.k.a. What a jackass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
Wikipedia's errors spill undetected into newspapers. ... it was not removed before the Daily News relied on it in this story:

Wikipedia, doing the work American journalist's refuse to do.

19 posted on 03/10/2007 7:21:28 AM PST by Michael.SF. (In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Conservapedia

Read the entry on George W. Bush there. It's embarrasingly bad. Most of the articles read like they were written as 9th grade writing assigments.
20 posted on 03/10/2007 7:21:54 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson