I also don't believe "we" have to make unfounded accusations with our "words." There's plenty of dirt on a guy like Edwards without having to stoop to that.
And you know, if I thought someone had a same sex attraction but wasn't acting on it, I might actually have compassion on that issue - I wouldn't call him a faggot. Your attempts to "explain" Ann's remark is pathetic. So tha's a good reason to call someone a faggot? geesh And since we don't know have one iota of proof that John Edwards is a practicing homosexual, it's just a damn lie! That kind of joke is sick, but Ann knew what she was doing. She's not a stupid fool, even if I do think she's arrogant.
Oh, and if you don't see the difference between calling someone arrogant and calling someone a faggot, you need to think about it.
"Your attempts to "explain" Ann's remark is pathetic. So tha's a good reason to call someone a faggot? geesh And since we don't know have one iota of proof that John Edwards is a practicing homosexual, it's just a damn lie!"
---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---
You really don't belong in this discussion.
It is apparent from the quote of yours above that you STILL haven't even tried to listen to WHAT ANN SAID! You seriously owe it to yourself.
Until you do so, I'm simply going to consider you just as much of a maroon as the Demodogs who accept the FRAUDcasters' characterization of Republicans as gospel.
Get the facts, young man. It's the "conservative" thing to do.
"I also don't believe "we" have to make unfounded accusations with our "words." There's plenty of dirt on a guy like Edwards without having to stoop to that."
What stooping? He's a faggoty little wuss, and it's a national disgrace that he's even in public life.
"Your attempts to "explain" Ann's remark is pathetic."
I'm not explaining anything. I'm telling you that you're wrongheaded for disapproving of her remark.
"So tha's a good reason to call someone a faggot?"
Since when do we have to have good reasons for things like that? What do you want, a Federal Bureau of Levity to license jokes?
"And since we don't know have one iota of proof that John Edwards is a practicing homosexual"
We have already established the irrelevance of that argument, so you really ought to retire it.
"That kind of joke is sick"
See? Utterly wrongheaded.
"but Ann knew what she was doing."
Yeah, she was standing up to the pervofascist would-be dictators and telling them that she's not intimidated.
"Oh, and if you don't see the difference between calling someone arrogant and calling someone a faggot, you need to think about it."
No, if you think calling someone a faggot is that big a deal, you need to think. If you think there's something wrong with speech that expresses disapproval of loathsome perversions, you need to get out of America.