Replies

I generally agree with the article. But personally, I draw the line with the use of vulgarity....
-----
Ann was not being vulgar. She was being real and colloquial. It does not bother me at all and it was just an opportunity for the gay-pander left to harp on one of their most notable and correct critics. That is all it was and she has my full support and kudos for calling a "spade a spade"...it fit and it was applied. Good for her.

I consider the word common and vulgar. Which is the reason it was banned from use in my home growing up and would be banned from my home if I were raising children today.

It is certainly not for use in a public venue such as CPAC. But comparatively, it is a relatively minor offense and I am not going to crucify Ann for it.

Ann was not being vulgar. She was being real and colloquial

I am asking this in good faith, NOT trying to stir ANYTHING. ok?

My question is: What if Hillary said the SAME THING about one of our people running? Would we be GENEROUS to her????? (I think we all automatically in our head just said "nope".)

Why do you think Barrack Obama is soaring ? He's smart, and he is "offering hope" and that is what the people are looking for. (no I do not plan on voting for him.)Why do you think Pres. Bush was elected ? He offered hope and was a decent man. People are sick of mean spiritedness's, I believe.

This "GOTCHA" has to stop. And we have to expect more CLASS than what Coulter said. There is NO excuse for it. Did she think she would be a "hit" ??? or did she NEED attention ?