Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
I don't think the Supreme Court would accept that.

Really? So what is the proscribed militia weapon? What would they decide that on? Don't say musket, they are no longer in "common use".

916 posted on 03/10/2007 8:20:23 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies ]


To: MileHi
"So what is the proscribed militia weapon? What would they decide that on?"

The state would testify. It's their call and no one elses.

They have the responsibility to form a Militia. If the state says they intend to arm their Militia with 6" shotguns, then the federal government may not infringe on the availability of that weapon. Doing so would infringe on the ability of a state to form their Militia, a violation of the second amendment.

949 posted on 03/10/2007 9:28:59 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson