The state would testify. It's their call and no one elses.
They have the responsibility to form a Militia. If the state says they intend to arm their Militia with 6" shotguns, then the federal government may not infringe on the availability of that weapon. Doing so would infringe on the ability of a state to form their Militia, a violation of the second amendment.
And if the state is part of a so called government tyranny does that mean that the militia is also.
The whole business of "the People" being armed independent of any government is to prevent the tyranny of the government.
Your position is baseless and foolhardy.
ahhmmm BS
And if they don't (as is the case, practically speaking), their negligence does NOT diminish the individual's right to keep and bear arms. This was plainly addressed in the DC Circuit's verdict, which obviously you still haven't read (and many people on this thread, who have, wish you would stop spouting off until you do).