To: cryptical
'That right existed prior to the formation of the new government under the Constitution and was premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad). In addition, the right to keep and bear arms had the important and salutary civic purpose of helping to preserve the citizen militia.'
This is excellent!! Finally someone gets it. now let me have an m16 to defend myself from a tyrannical government or threat from abroad.
20 posted on
03/09/2007 8:18:16 AM PST by
lakeman
(when a marine kills the only thing he feels is the recoil of his rifle)
To: lakeman
Finally someone gets it. now let me have an m16 to defend myself from a tyrannical government or threat from abroad.Don't happen to know where I could find a quad-40 and some ammo, do you? The ducks get bigger & fly higher, every year. ;)
529 posted on
03/09/2007 2:10:57 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: lakeman
"This is excellent!! Finally someone gets it. now let me have an m16 to defend myself from a tyrannical government or threat from abroad."
Personally, I want an AR-10 or a G-3, but otherwise, I'm with you, FRiend! Think we could stretch it to a GAU-8?
604 posted on
03/09/2007 4:02:42 PM PST by
Old Student
(We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
To: lakeman
Finally someone gets it. now let me have an m16 to defend myself from a tyrannical government or threat from abroad.There is no legal prohibition actually on owning an M16 provided one meets the mostly financial requirements of the law which are open to all non-felons.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson