Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lakeman
Finally someone gets it. now let me have an m16 to defend myself from a tyrannical government or threat from abroad.

There is no legal prohibition actually on owning an M16 provided one meets the mostly financial requirements of the law which are open to all non-felons.

637 posted on 03/09/2007 5:11:37 PM PST by Andrew Byler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Andrew Byler

Current Federal law prohibits the sale of newly manufactured fully automatic weapons, so now we have a limited and aging supply of NFA guns. This is clearly contrary to the "well-regulated" provision of the 2nd Amendment. It is impossible to characterize a militia which is incapable of carrying out its mission as "well-regulate." The Constitutionally defined missions of the militia according to Article 1 Section 8 are to a) enforce the laws of the US b) suppress rebellions and c) defend against foreign invasion. If the militia was going to actually defend against foreign invasion full auto weapons would be required, and are now, no where near as widely available as is realistically needed to perform the mission.


651 posted on 03/09/2007 5:33:34 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson