Posted on 03/08/2007 11:26:28 PM PST by april15Bendovr
My guess is that Fitz-fong is not going to be participating in a Waxman circus.
Was it necessary to call her a "ho"?
Are you the morality police? Are you in charge now?
And I wonder what the macho Republicans are going to do during this hearing.
"We're so sorry, Ms. Plame, that our Republican operative Libby gave away your identity."
"I make a motion to impeach the President for this dastardly deed."
"Mr. Wilson, you are an honorable man."
Insert other spineless phrases as you like.
Well I have no objections to calling the ho a "ho".
She willingly lied, peed on our feet and said it was raining, arranged for her pervert husband to undermine this country at war, then sat back and watched an innocent man be convicted.
Calling her a whore is flattering her now that I think about it.
Inside the beltway nonsense.
So true.
NRO Corner:
http://corner.nationalreview.com/
Valerie Plame Wilson's Testimony [Byron York]
If Valerie Plame Wilson testifies before Congress, she will likely be asked detailed questions about her job status. Judge Reggie Walton tried, unsuccessfully, to keep the issue out of the Libby trial. But as Henry Waxman pointed out, that was a narrow legal proceeding, and a congressional hearing would have a broader scope.
So Mrs. Wilson will likely be asked what years she operated under non-official cover. She will likely be asked about her return to the United States, about her maternity leave, and about her job description when she returned to work. She will likely be asked whether that job description could accurately be called covert. She will likely be asked whether her area of work had changed, or was changing, at the time of Robert Novak's July 14, 2003 column that mentioned her name. And she will likely be asked what, if any, damage to national security resulted from the publication of her name.
These questions have never been answered publicly — even Judge Walton said he didn't know the answers — and Mrs. Wilson's appearance before the House committee will finally give us an opportunity to learn the answers.
Hey Waxman ... that works both ways
This is the never ending TV trail. Imagine seeing OJ in court for the rest of your life. The DEMS are repeating the lie until you believe it. The RINOS of the GOP will believe it just hoping it will go away. How long can you hold out?
I seem to remember reading early when this broke that Plame's neighbors had known for years that she worked in a classifed position for the CIA. So much for her security; seems to have been common knowledge.
Plame's name was leaked to reporters by Joseph Wilson before he began telling everyone Vice President Cheney sent him to Niger and long before he criticized the Bush administration's handling of prewar intelligence on Iraq.
Well, only if you are sure she'll tell the truth.
If we really want to know the answers to those questions, we should call her boss.
She will seem like a nice little mommy, and the Republicans won't stand a chance of asking her any hard questions because the Dems will accuse themof wanting this nice woman to get killed because Libby said her name.
This IS the Anna Nichol case of the govt!!
Anyone know who the Reps are on this committee? This could backfire on the Dems big time if the Reps are focused and articulate.
The facts are against Ms. Phlame in my opinion.
CIA wants to block her book. Maybe testifying is the only way around getting her book released for her sorry ass and her liberal friends.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.