Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Attorneys Tell Of Political Pressure (Justice Officials Pushed For Probe Of Democrats)
Concord Monitor / Washington Post ^ | Dan Eggen and Paul Kane

Posted on 03/08/2007 3:27:25 PM PST by steve-b

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: balch3
shouldn't have let these Clinton appointees hang around in the first place.

None of these was a Clinton appointee.

21 posted on 03/08/2007 4:34:18 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jcparks

We need to go the FreeRepublic pages of each state that had a prosecutor fired and ask, what is being cover up. My guess is that we will find cases of voter fraud and corruption that were just ignored if there was a (D) following the name.


22 posted on 03/08/2007 4:35:58 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

One of the big ones (not one of these, though) was a New Yorker who was a Clinton holdover, IIRC.


23 posted on 03/08/2007 4:39:59 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
(Justice Officials Pushed For Probe Of Democrats)

Havent those Justice officials learned by now that laws do not apply to Democrats?

24 posted on 03/08/2007 5:05:03 PM PST by lowbridge ("Of course Americans should vote Democrat" -Jihad Jaara, senior member, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
One of the big ones (not one of these, though) was a New Yorker who was a Clinton holdover, IIRC.

Mary Jo White was, I believe, the only Clinton holdover, because of some big case she was in the middle of. But even she was replaced in 2002 (by Comey, who was later replaced by someone else).

25 posted on 03/08/2007 5:42:02 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

I stand corrected. Thanks for the info. I had heard differently.


26 posted on 03/09/2007 8:32:25 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Belated reply - in today's Seattle Times, McKay claims he investigated complaints about the 2004 election and found no evidence of fraud. He might be lying or leaving out something, but that's what he said.


27 posted on 03/13/2007 12:33:30 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
None of these USAs are Clinton appointees.

When did FR become such a fact-free zone? It is like no one even cares if what they say is true, as long as it has the proper partisan slant.

28 posted on 03/13/2007 12:45:43 PM PDT by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
"I had heard differently."

Probably here.

29 posted on 03/13/2007 12:46:54 PM PDT by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Mary Jo White held over for a couple of years, then left. That, and her seat, has absolutely zero to do with this issue.


30 posted on 03/13/2007 12:48:13 PM PDT by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

the southern district covering manhattan, that US attorney (a Dem) stayed on longer. I forget his name now.


31 posted on 03/13/2007 12:48:50 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I thought that I read on the Evergreen article that McKay had claimed that the voter fraud was a state issue, not a federal issue, because ot was a state office that was in contention. The fact remains that it was a federal election.


32 posted on 03/13/2007 12:57:21 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Kelley (who was a Dem) replaced Comey on an "interim" basis, but stayed two years. Michael Garcia was the permanent replacement.


33 posted on 03/13/2007 1:11:08 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

My memory is failing but I seem to recall that there was someone from NY who was fired and it was not MJW. My memory might be totally faulty, though.


34 posted on 03/13/2007 1:42:35 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
the southern district covering manhattan, that US attorney (a Dem) stayed on longer. I forget his name now.

May Jo White. She stayed on until 2002.

35 posted on 03/13/2007 2:02:10 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

No, not here. I know nothing of you, so I won't presume that you are an ass. Don't presume anything about me.


36 posted on 03/13/2007 2:36:37 PM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Are you even following the story? These guys were all appointed by Bush.


37 posted on 03/13/2007 2:39:35 PM PDT by erton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: erton1

Are you going to let a little thing like reality interrupt a perfectly good rant?


38 posted on 03/13/2007 2:43:08 PM PDT by voltaires_zit (Government is the problem, not the answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: voltaires_zit

You're right. LOL


39 posted on 03/13/2007 2:45:11 PM PDT by erton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst
Yes where was Di-Fi? The Liberal DemoRAT Senator wants to have hearings to "confirm" US attys now, but when Janet Reno was ordered By Clinton to Fire All 93 Us Attys...She had no complaints..

U.S. Attorneys are presidential appointees. Every U.S. president fires the prior president's appointees and puts in his own. Bush fired every Clinton-appointed US Attorney (with only one exception out of 93, and that one was replaced within a year) and appointed his own people. (What was unique about Clinton was that he fired every sitting US Attorney en masse; most presidents --including Bush in 2001-- let the former administration's US Attorneys continue to serve until the new appointee is nominated and confirmed. Clinton did this because he wanted the Arkansas US Attorney, who was investigating Whitewater, out right away, and he fired all of the US Attorneys at once to try to hide what he was doing.)

It is well within the President's power to fire his own appointed US Attorneys at any time, but historically, this has very, very rarely been done. Bush has now fired 8 of his own appointees in a matter of weeks, which is legal, but unprecedented.

The other reason this is different from 1993 is that Bush proposed (and Congress passed) a change to the law last year (it was a little-noticed provision of the Patriot Act renewal): it used to be that, if a US Attorney died, resigned or was fired, the President would have to seek Senate confirmation of his successor; if the successor wasn't appointed and confirmed within 120 days, the judges in that district's federal court would elect the temporary successor, who would serve until the president nominated a successor and the Senate confirmed him. Under the new law, Bush can fire a US Attorney and appoint a successor who can serve indefinitely without Senate confirmation. When Clinton fired all of the U.S. Attorneys in 1993, his new appointees all needed Senate confirmation, and the courts appointed interim successors for any not confirmed within 120 days.

40 posted on 03/13/2007 2:59:52 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson