To: pray4liberty
I am really surprised...finally, the EEOC actually did something to help someone who was definitely and outrageously discriminated against. The EEOC sides with the employer in 99.9% of the cases they hear. That's of course assuming this story as reported is entirely true and/or in context
But I got to ask, why is this a federal case? The feds have this little to do that they can investigate a simple workplace dispute like this?
37 posted on
03/07/2007 4:03:38 PM PST by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: qam1
But I got to ask, why is this a federal case? The feds have this little to do that they can investigate a simple workplace dispute like this?Federal workplace discrimination laws were passed by Congress at a time when state governments could not be trusted to enforce equal rights -- often as not, they were as guilty as any company they were supposed to regulate. You could make a case that the EEOA, and a lot of other federal civil rights laws, are no longer necessary, and that the states could take over that duty -- but politically, no one's gonna want to touch that.
To: qam1
But I got to ask, why is this a federal case? The feds have this little to do that they can investigate a simple workplace dispute like this?It is the EEOC's job to enforce Federal law in employment disputes where discrimination occurs due to someone's age, race, sex or religion.
For more information, contact EEOC.gov.
43 posted on
03/07/2007 4:53:47 PM PST by
pray4liberty
(http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
To: qam1
But I got to ask, why is this a federal case? The feds have this little to do that they can investigate a simple workplace dispute like this? It was probably a federal (rather than state) law that was violated.
55 posted on
03/07/2007 6:35:39 PM PST by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson