Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple stand by forbidden love
BBC News ^

Posted on 03/07/2007 11:32:08 AM PST by Irontank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Irontank

Ewwwww. Just...ewwwwwwww.


41 posted on 03/07/2007 12:06:13 PM PST by USMCWife6869 (Godspeed Sand Sharks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
LOL...and Rudy is not the first...we've had at least one President who married a cousin...albeit a 5th cousin

To be fair, at 5th cousin it hardly matters anymore. In fact, it hardly matters at third, except of course for the scandal associated with all of it. Still best avoided for that reason and just the general weirdness.
42 posted on 03/07/2007 12:07:34 PM PST by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
I do feel somewhat sorry for them. Even though they are genetically related, they weren't raised as brother and sister so those normal brother/sister feelings didn't develop.

I suppose there's a lot of truth to that. But still...it's weird. I'm an only child so I don't fully understand that whole brother / sister thing, but I don't have to to know it's just wrong. I just don't have a feel for the degree of wrongness associated with it.

Still I see your point, and I suppose I do feel bad for them on some level, but still....
43 posted on 03/07/2007 12:09:35 PM PST by JamesP81 (Eph 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Sickening ... but not surprising. Just another product of the breakdown of the family in the Western world. When society offers no rules and "freedom" comes to equal license, why is anyone surprised that some idiot will stand up and say, "Why can't I marry my sister, d@mn it!?"


44 posted on 03/07/2007 12:10:38 PM PST by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
"We would like society to recognise us, as any other normal couple"

Ewwwwww! I don't think so.
45 posted on 03/07/2007 12:10:41 PM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Good laugh. I'm not sure everyone got the indeundo.

Angelina Jolie has been suspect with her brother James Haven after they passionately kissed at the 2000 Oscars.


46 posted on 03/07/2007 12:11:09 PM PST by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble
"This couple are not harming anyone. It is discrimination. And besides, we must not forget that every child is so valuable," said Dr Wilhelm.

"It is based on long traditions in Western societies, and the law is here for a good reason," said Prof Kunze.


Do these arguments sound familiar to anyone else?
47 posted on 03/07/2007 12:12:48 PM PST by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

This is sick!!!I love my brothers but never enough to marry them...What are the people in this world doing..How long will it be before God says he has had enough?


48 posted on 03/07/2007 12:13:46 PM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Getting into one-eye country, there, aren't you?


49 posted on 03/07/2007 12:14:12 PM PST by trimom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: day10

Give her a mustache and that's a MAN baby!
*snerk*


50 posted on 03/07/2007 12:16:08 PM PST by Darksheare (She had the face of a trucker. She used it as a purse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
Oh man, shades of that X-Files episode, yuck.

However, the article does raise an interesting point. The law is ostensibly motivated by concern for the potential progeny. But then, if one were consistent (I know, how likely is that?), shouldn't the same concern require general genetic testing of prospective parents and, where there are likely health concerns, reproduction be prohibited? And conversely, suppose close relatives were tested and the likelihood of defects was very low, how could such a union be opposed?

51 posted on 03/07/2007 12:18:18 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Sterilize one of them and let them go.


52 posted on 03/07/2007 12:21:29 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I have an older cousin who is recently divorced..shes related to me on my mothers side..

I have an uncle who was recently widowed..hes my dad's brother..

I always kind of thought my cousin and my uncle should hook up..

"This is my cousin, Aunt Darlene...and it would make my Uncle John my cousin too."

If nothing else, it would give us something to talk about at parties...


53 posted on 03/07/2007 12:22:29 PM PST by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
But then, if one were consistent (I know, how likely is that?), shouldn't the same concern require general genetic testing of prospective parents and, where there are likely health concerns, reproduction be prohibited? And conversely, suppose close relatives were tested and the likelihood of defects was very low, how could such a union be opposed?

Or if brother or sister were past child bearing age? Or same sex siblings?

54 posted on 03/07/2007 12:23:27 PM PST by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Ick - that was really more than I wanted to know about them. Just let them move to West Virgina, and no one will care.


55 posted on 03/07/2007 12:24:21 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

I think the ACLU will skip incest and go right on to pedophilia.


56 posted on 03/07/2007 12:24:23 PM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: day10

You are missed my dear.

57 posted on 03/07/2007 12:30:25 PM PST by Millee (Tagline free since 10/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Maybe I missed it but I didn't think that was the issue here. But certainly one couldn't oppose those based on the logic behind this law.


58 posted on 03/07/2007 12:33:42 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble

I remember Rick's comments well and thought they were a bellwether at the time. No wonder the world has sought to bring him down. Truth cannot be tolerated.


59 posted on 03/07/2007 12:34:25 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

60 posted on 03/07/2007 12:35:50 PM PST by Fighting Irish (enter your tagline here ... for only $29.95 per day get noticed by millions of viewers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson