Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: soccermom; TAdams8591

On the matter of dehydration explaining her brain size: get a grip. There was 5 times as much cerebrospinal fluid in her skull as should have been there. Conceivably, dehydration could have explained a small amount of the change in brain mass. Let's go way over the top and say 10%. Her brain was still about half the size it should have been.

Large parts of her brain, most of it, were, flatly, gone.

Under no circumstances, ever, was she going to recover.

Now, whether she should have been remanded into the custody of her parents, since they wanted to keep her alive anyway, is another matter entirely. An injustice, in the absence of a clear living will, might well have been done there.

Anyway, it's great that the woman in this story wasn't damaged like that, so she could recover.


47 posted on 03/07/2007 9:29:03 AM PST by voltaires_zit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: voltaires_zit

I'm not debating whether or not she would recover. I really don't know. All I'm saying is that there is a big difference between being "brain dead" and being in a PVS. If someone were to conduct a poll and ask people if they would, morally, support pulling the plug on a "brain dead" person, I would answer "yes". Unfortunately, reporters would incorrectly extrapolate from that that I support starving/dehydrating to death someone like Schiavo. From a moral standpoint, as I understand it, the Catholic Church does not oppose removing artificial life support from someone who is "brain dead." The problem I have with the news coverage of the Schiavo case is they kept reporting it as she were "brain dead", when she wasn't. Thus, public opinion on the issue was skewed. I don't know if she would recover or not. All I know is that she was alive in the same sense that a baby is. She had to bed fed, washed and changed, just like a baby. But she could also breathe, move a little and have a heartbeat like a baby. It is a crime that she wasn't given at least the opportunity to develop.


54 posted on 03/07/2007 10:03:17 AM PST by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: voltaires_zit

"An injustice, in the absence of a clear living will, might well have been done there."

Hers was just such a case; I would rather use the word inhumane than injustice, though.


60 posted on 03/07/2007 10:48:16 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: voltaires_zit
"Her brain was still about half the size it should have been."

Last night on an episode of HOUSE doctors removed the entire right hemisphere (HALF) of a man's brain because they believed by so doing his overall brain function would vastly improve. He was neither in a coma or vegetative state before or after the surgery. And the entire program is based on real medicine.

Terri who was not brain dead, or in a comatose or vegetative state, was brain damaged. After Michael left her languishing for over ten years with no therapy what so ever, some recovery for Terri was less promising, but not hopeless. And as cases like the one in this article prove, doctors are frequently wrong.

61 posted on 03/07/2007 10:54:51 AM PST by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson