This guy was Juror #9 -- they couldn't have used up all the objections as they were considering Juror #9. It was clear from the interview yesterday that this guy was Fitz's representative and advocate in the jury room. He walked these jurors through a meticulous recounting of all of the "evidence" that supported Libby's conviction -- Post-It Notes tied to every witness... But let's ignore all the mis-remembering and bad memories of the many jurors. And let's accept Fitz's concluding arguments that made this trial all about getting Cheney and Bush -- making statements that were not supported by any evidence brought into the trial. And the Judge (a Bush Appointee!) allowing all of this to happen and showing outrage when Libby wasn't put on the stand!
Look up "Show-Trial" in websters and the Libby Trial will start playing on You-Tube.
He might have been juror #9 during the trial...but he could have been #309 during the selection process.
(a) How do you know? Remember: DC jury
(b) What if they had used over 90% of their challenges? They had three jurors to go, plus alternates.