Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vermont Votes to Impeach Bush/Cheney
Yahoo ^ | 3/7/07

Posted on 03/07/2007 5:32:56 AM PST by Mr. Brightside

Vermont Votes to Impeach Bush/Cheney

John Nichols

Wed Mar 7, 12:36 AM ET

The Nation -- When Vermont Governor Jim Douglas, a Republican with reasonably close ties to President Bush, asked if there was any additional business to be considered at the town meeting he was running in Middlebury, Ellen McKay popped up and proposed the impeachment of Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

The governor was not amused. As moderator of the annual meeting, he tried to suggest that the proposal to impeach -- along with another proposal to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq -- could not be voted on.

But McKay, a program coordinator at Middlebury College, pressed her case. And it soon became evident that the crowd at the annual meeting shared her desire to hold the president to account.

So Douglas backed down.

"It became clear that no one was going home until they had the chance to discuss the resolutions and vote on them," explained David Rosenberg, a political science professor at Middlebury College. "And being a good politician, he allowed the vote to happen."

By an overwhelming voice vote, Middlebury called for impeachment.

So it has gone this week at town meetings across Vermont, most of which were held Tuesday.

Late Tuesday night, there were confirmed reports that 35 towns had backed impeachment resolutions, and the number was expected to rise.

In one town, Putney, the vote for impeachment was unanimous.

In addition to Governor Douglas's Middlebury, the town of Hartland, which is home to Congressman Peter Welch (news, bio, voting record), backed impeachment. So, too, did Jericho, the home of Gaye Symington, the speaker of the Vermont House of Representatives.

Organizers of the grassroots drive to get town meetings to back impeachment resolutions hope that the overwhelming support the initiative has received will convince Welch to introduce articles of impeachment against Bush and Cheney. That's something the Democratic congressman is resisting, even though his predecessor, Bernie Sanders, signed on last year to a proposal by Michigan Congressman John Conyers (news, bio, voting record) to set up a House committee to look into impeachment.

Vermont activists also want their legislature to approve articles of impeachment and forward them to Congress. But Symington, also a Democrat, has discouraged the initiative, despite the fact that more than 20 representatives have cosponsored an impeachment resolution.

"It's going to be hard for Peter Welch and Gaye Symington to say there's no sentiment for impeachment, now that their own towns have voted for it," says Dan DeWalt, a Newfane, Vermont, town selectman who started the impeachment initiative last year in his town, and who now plans to launch a campaign to pressure Welch and Symington to respect and reflect the will of the people.

It is going to be even harder for Governor Douglas, who just this month spent two nights at the Bush White House, to face his president.

After all, Douglas now lives in a town that is on record in support of Bush's impeachment and trial for high crimes and misdemeanors.

For the record, Middlebury says:

We the people have the power -- and the responsibility -- to remove executives who transgress not just the law, but the rule of law.

The oaths that the President and Vice President take binds them to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." The failure to do so forms a sound basis for articles of impeachment.

The President and Vice President have failed to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" in the following ways:

1. They have manipulated intelligence and misled the country to justify an immoral, unjust, and unnecessary preemptive war in Iraq.

2. They have directed the government to engage in domestic spying without warrants, in direct contravention of U.S. law.

3. They have conspired to commit the torture of prisoners, in violation of the Federal Torture Act and the Geneva Convention.

4. They have ordered the indefinite detention without legal counsel, without charges and without the opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention -- all in violation of U.S. law and the Bill of Rights.

When strong evidence exists of the most serious crimes, we must use impeachment -- or lose the ability of the legislative branch to compel the executive branch to obey the law.

George Bush has led our country to a constitutional crisis, and it is our responsibility to remove him from office.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: hatebushcrowd; impeachment; liberals; moonbats; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: msnimje
When do we vote on whether or not to let Canada have Vermont?

+1

61 posted on 03/07/2007 6:57:02 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas (Nothing witty here... move on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: angkor

LOL, no he probably was his significant other.


62 posted on 03/07/2007 7:01:42 AM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Vermont is suffering from sever BDS!


63 posted on 03/07/2007 7:05:23 AM PST by CSM ("My favorite therapist: Jack Bauer." - mewzilla, 3/1/2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Awe-inspiring reduction to cultural stereotype. Keep it coming!


64 posted on 03/07/2007 7:06:29 AM PST by hedgie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: spower
Now that this important piece of business has been addressed, maybe they can get on to other affairs, such as prosecuting all the child molesters running around up there.

Priorities are a little misplaced to say the least.

65 posted on 03/07/2007 7:10:37 AM PST by Proudcongal (One cannot have an understanding of or respect for the U.S. Constitution and be a leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
Bill Clinton was impeached for perjury. Lying under oath before a legislative or judicial body, i.e., purjury, is a crime.

Let's not short-change him... he was also impeached for the far more serious crime of suborning perjury from other witnesses, specifically Betty Currie.

66 posted on 03/07/2007 7:16:46 AM PST by kevkrom (WARNING: The above post may contain sarcasm... if unsure, please remember to use all precautions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside; longshadow

If only Ethan Allen and Robert Rogers had had this crowd available to weigh them down. There would be no need to sell, cede, or abandon Vermont to Quebec. Vermont and all of the US would still be a european colony and they could have all that great socialist medical care, which is what the bulk of these aging hippie non native "Vermonters" deserve.


67 posted on 03/07/2007 7:17:14 AM PST by Gail Wynand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
My God.....today it's Vermont and tomorrow,what? Massachusetts?
68 posted on 03/07/2007 7:18:35 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

One joint too many it seems. Somebody needs to advise them that there has to be legitimate bases for impeachment according to the CONSTITUTION (something liberals don't believe in) called high crimes and misdemeanors. You don't just impeach because you're a terrorist-loving, American-hating, communist-supporting pacifist who happens to hate the sitting president.


69 posted on 03/07/2007 7:19:06 AM PST by Proudcongal (One cannot have an understanding of or respect for the U.S. Constitution and be a leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
You know .... you're entirely too hung up on this whole "truth" thing. That's just not how we decide policy anymore now that the Democrats are in charge. Now... it's all about intent. Don't worry about the evidence, worry about your perception of their intent. THAT's the kind of thing that makes policy nowadays.

You just can seem to keep from being stuck in the past can you?

70 posted on 03/07/2007 7:23:42 AM PST by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
As one who live in Vermont now..... These stupid Bush lied/people died type of feel good votes; both local and federal are a waste of time. The folks supporting them are the definition of the loonie left. The majority of the ones driving this type of B.S. in this state, are living off of their trust funds, and are from Mass. or N.Y. ( Bernie Sanders is from Brooklyn IIRC)

Please keep in mind their values do not represent everyone in the state. There are some true conservatives. Bashing the state as a whole ( a F.R. sport it seems) serves no purpose other than driving wedges between the folks who need to work together i.e. conservatives.

For all those wanting to write the state off ... I say look around you, your own utopia might not be as great as you think.
71 posted on 03/07/2007 7:24:33 AM PST by lost in the snow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
Not one of these charges is true.

If this statement is true and no proof exists, then the ones spreading the rumors are guilty of sedition, and it would appear that Howard Dean, John Kerry, Teddy Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi and a host of Democratic leaders and mainstream media should have special prosecutors on their a$$es just like Scooter Libby.

72 posted on 03/07/2007 7:24:40 AM PST by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

The Brookline Town Council did this last year. I had my Republican City Committee pass a resolution declaring war on them.


73 posted on 03/07/2007 7:30:32 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Was browsing on the DU threads this morning to see what they were saying and found:

Scooter coverup much larger, about forged Niger documents

With what we already know about Joe Wilson's clairvoyancy (and Cannistraro's) concerning those documents, if they want an investigation...I say:

Bring it on!


74 posted on 03/07/2007 7:38:44 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
The Brookline Town Council did this last year. I had my Republican City Committee pass a resolution declaring war on them.

During the 90's my Dad lived in Brookline (near the Harvard Medical Area...lots of "progressives")for a while.I'd visit him and stay with him regularly to help him out and keep him company (he was along in years then). During these visits bumper stickers were regularly removed from my bumper.I consider myself lucky that nothing worse than that happened to my car.

75 posted on 03/07/2007 7:43:32 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: lost in the snow
Please keep in mind their values do not represent everyone in the state. There are some true conservatives. Bashing the state as a whole ( a F.R. sport it seems) serves no purpose other than driving wedges between the folks who need to work together i.e. conservatives.

For all those wanting to write the state off ... I say look around you, your own utopia might not be as great as you think.


I concur...! Vermont is a wonderful place. About 43% of voters are decent conservatives. The liberal/"alternate lifestyle" crowd targeted Vermont years ago and, led by Howard Dean, Madeline Kunin, Bernie Sanders, et al., have successfully forged a noisy majority.

Nevertheless, there are many, many good true American conservatives in Vermont. I'll name two: (1) John McClaughry, former speach writer for Reagan and Town Moderator in Kirby, Vermont. He may even be a Freeper. (Who is "RealVermonter?") Runs the very thoughtful Ethan Allen Institute, and (2) Paul Presault, who after years of fighting Bernie Sanders and Company up to the Supreme Court and back, eventually won a judgement for taking his property without just compensation.

As for Maple Syrup, there is only genuine maple syrup. I suggest you look up Goodrich's Sugar House on the internet. They ship nationwide. One of the largest in the State. Run by true fiscal and social conservatives, as many of the sugar operators are.

Bottom line. If you all want to do something about Vermont, it wouldn't take many to buy a place in Vermont and start a conservative takeover. There are a lot of real Vermonter allies up there. Only problem is that it gets a bit cold in winter.

You learn how to win hearts and minds and votes in Vermont, and conservatives will be empowered to stop and reverse the liberal slouching toward Gommorah.
76 posted on 03/07/2007 8:06:42 AM PST by LukeSW (The truth shall make you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LukeSW

Cold is all relative. It was -25 this morning without the wind. Just imagine what it would be like without global warming!


77 posted on 03/07/2007 8:12:28 AM PST by lost in the snow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bikerMD

"Vermont maple"
You can get Canadian real maple syrup.


78 posted on 03/07/2007 8:25:59 AM PST by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
They'll obviously believe anything they are told by the MSM and Democrat politicians despite how many times it is proved false.

This is what we get when we interpret freedom of speech and freedom of the press to mean freedom to lie and dishonestly attack others without consequence.

79 posted on 03/07/2007 8:30:43 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Just exile the morons, don't give up the territory.


80 posted on 03/07/2007 8:33:20 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson