Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy: Presidents generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them.
FOX News ^ | July 20, 2005 | Hannity & Colmes

Posted on 03/06/2007 10:53:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 03/06/2007 11:02:15 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Jim Robinson
I can't comprehend why a prominent conservative like Sean Hannity and others can't understand that a pro-abortion candidate like Giulinai wouldn't nomination originalists to the court. Hannity has become one of the Kool-Aid drinkers he always criticizes.
21 posted on 03/06/2007 11:20:05 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Make that "McCain-Feingold-THOMPSON."

The enemies of the First Amendment are realizing McCain's dead, and are moving towards running Johnnie-boy's bosom buddy, Fred Thompson.

22 posted on 03/06/2007 11:20:40 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"The man is an admitted abortionist and he most definitely will appoint abortionists to the court! He believes in "a woman's RIGHT to choose" and that Roe vs Wade is constitutional."

Definitely. To see it otherwise really is delusional.

23 posted on 03/06/2007 11:20:44 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Rudy SAID he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia

I'm convinced!

YES! The SC Justices he would appoint would be human, breathe oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide and have been born since 1900.

JUST LIKE Roberts and Scalia.

Yes! Vote early and often for Rudy!

I'm convinced!

Cheers!


24 posted on 03/06/2007 11:20:49 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

And, in addition to all that, Rudy SUCKS!


25 posted on 03/06/2007 11:21:57 PM PST by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country?

works both ways

26 posted on 03/06/2007 11:22:30 PM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
"So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country?"

I have a problem with it...
27 posted on 03/06/2007 11:24:51 PM PST by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Three votes against Rudy...


28 posted on 03/06/2007 11:25:29 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

Bush43`s two appointments to the SCOTUS are in the early stages of their tenure. What happens 10-20 years down the road is an unknown factor at this time. No one can see into the future. So far, so good.

Bush43 has always been an open borders/amnesty. He supports liberal immigration reform as spelled out in Senate bill S2611. Bush, Giuliani and McCain all want comprehensive immigration reform. They all opposed House bill HR 4437 when it passed the GOP House vote in Dec2005.


29 posted on 03/06/2007 11:28:55 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nolan
We well be a lot better off once Republicans start to realize that Rudy is the man and quit cherry picking old meaningless quotes, articles and video clips.

We who? You a fugitive from DU?

30 posted on 03/06/2007 11:29:03 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Nice basic summary. I agree.


31 posted on 03/06/2007 11:30:07 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

THAT pic BEAUTIFULLY and SIMPLY says it all.


32 posted on 03/06/2007 11:31:03 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

I trust my own 'lying eyes' to what others may tell me, pure as driven snow though their hearts may be.

I view Rudy's moral trajectory to date and have to trust my own discernment over Rudy's campaign statements and Ted Olson's honest beliefs. What is being postulated about Rudy is antithetical to Rudy's long-term pro-NARAL stance and public endorsement.

The best indicator of future performance is past performance. I do not believe that Rudy's past performance will suddenly be countermanded.


To paraphrase Forrest Gump:

Life is like a tracer bullet--one can generally tell where it's going by the moral trajectory thus far.


33 posted on 03/06/2007 11:31:43 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

Bush's judges are fine by me.


34 posted on 03/06/2007 11:31:54 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

He assumes that SC judges are "very much influenced by precedent", and "should be a very good lawyer". Well, color me unimpressed. No where in his last answers is any mention of the constitution. He sounds like a "stare decisis" kind of guy, and we already have enough of those.

We need judges associated with an originalist or at a minimum a strict constructionist judicial philosophy. I assume if he means to appoint a nominee to SCOTUS that agrees with his political philosophy we are likely to see another O'Conner, or even worse another Souter type of judge on the bench. Yuk! Sounds like shades of the Harriet Meiers failed nomination might return in spades.


35 posted on 03/06/2007 11:32:04 PM PST by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

LOL!!!


36 posted on 03/06/2007 11:33:14 PM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08, NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Good catch. ..and it's really just common sense that Rudy will surround himself with people who think likewise.. just maybe 'conservatives' that welcomed and applauded Rudy at CPAC should be more ashamed at that than what Coulter said.


37 posted on 03/06/2007 11:36:23 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America..Duncan Hunter 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nolan

Welcome newbie. Another Rudybot signs on.


38 posted on 03/06/2007 11:38:37 PM PST by gpapa (Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nolan
"We well be a lot better off once Republicans start to realize that Rudy is the man and quit cherry picking old meaningless quotes, articles and video clips."

Cherry picking means you take someone's statement out of context...this is an entire eye opening interview.

If there was ever any doubt that Rudy is completely in the wrong party....this makes it clear.

39 posted on 03/06/2007 11:39:57 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller; gpapa; Smokin' Joe; flashbunny; Mike Nolan; Admin Moderator
Mike Nolan

All the marks of a troll. Posts and runs, doesn't answer when addressed.

40 posted on 03/06/2007 11:43:23 PM PST by EternalVigilance (( Mitt '08 - When Conservatism absolutely positively has to be destroyed .))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson