Posted on 03/06/2007 7:42:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Internet site Wikipedia has been hit by controversy after the disclosure that a prominent editor had assumed a false identity complete with fake PhD. The editor, known as Essjay, had described himself as a professor of religion at a private university.
But he was in fact Ryan Jordan, 24, a college student from Kentucky who used texts such as Catholicism for Dummies to help him work. He has retired from the site and his authority to edit has been cancelled. Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopaedia open to all, written by volunteers from around the world. 'Trust and tolerance' Under the name Essjay, Mr Jordan edited articles and also had the authority to arbitrate disputes between authors and remove site vandalism. In his user profile, he said he taught both undergraduate and graduate theology, and in an interview with the New Yorker in July 2006, was described as a "tenured professor of religion". His real identity came to light last week when the magazine added an editorial note to the piece highlighting the deception. "At the time of publication, neither we nor Wikipedia knew Essjay's real name," the note said.
Essjay told them he hid his identity because "he feared personal retribution from those he had ruled against online", the newspaper's note said. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, writing on the site on 3 March, said that Mr Jordan was apologetic, but that Wikipedia was "based on twin pillars of trust and tolerance". "Despite my personal forgiveness, I hope that he will accept my resignation request, because forgiveness or not, these positions are not appropriate for him now," he wrote. And in a post the next day, Mr Jordan announced his retirement from the site. "I hope others will refocus the energy they have spent the past few days in defending and denouncing me to make something here at Wikipedia better," he said.
|
So? Elmer Gantry character is alive and well. Bogus credentials and the rest of it.
no issue here
Essjay seemed to edit about every article I ever looked at there, I think even the one on Freerepublic.
I understand a couple of anti-FReepers are editing the Wikipedia entry on Free Republic.
When the history of the world is written, let's hope the wikkipederasts are all out of ink!
This guy could have a future career for him at CBS!
BUMP!
There are probably fewer factual errors at Wikipedia than the BBC or the New York Times.
I'm careful when I use it, but usually their articles are very good.
*****************************EXCERPT**********************************
Controversial aspects
Ivor Tossell of the Canadian Globe and Mail called Free Republic "the worst site on the Internet, political-rhetoric division" and "an exercise in political extremism that, despite being something of an anthropological train wreck, keeps popping up square in the mainstream."[16]
Too damn true...
"I'm careful when I use it, but usually their articles are very good."
I've found too many errors.
I can agree with that, except for real contorversial political things. For those I look for two sources.
I wills ay this trying to find which party voted for which gun control measure is very very difficult, the GCA of 1968 happened in a vacuum as as I know...
"I hope others will refocus the energy they have spent the past few days in defending and denouncing me to make something here at Wikipedia better," he said.
"Too soon" buddy. Forgiveness comes after the public flogging..... and the lawsuits that will probably happen.
CBS, NYT, MSDNC, the Compost - hell, we could see a bidding war for his services.
Certainly, "caveat emptor" applies to the internet and any site on the internet. People need to be judicious. It's sad Wikipedia got scammed but then again we have many phonies in universities across the country. At least, Wikipedia is free for the masses, unlike college educations.
He's a liberal, so not only does he get a pass from the flogging, he gets to move on to bigger and better things. I hear John Edwards needs an anti-Christian blogger for his campaign.
"A gold mine of insight on the Catholic faith for people of all ages and beliefs."
Prof. Charles E. Rice, Notre Dame School of Law and Visiting Prof., Ave Maria School of Law
The guy picked a good book. Fr. John Trigilio is a good writer.
I wonder if he managed to locate a copy of Calvinism for Dummies for his bookshelf?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.