To: snarkytart
Wishful thinking on my part?
It would be a complete miracle if he is found not guilty.
To: JRochelle
YOU ARE CORRECT. A COMPLETE AND TOTAL MIRACLE.
94 posted on
03/06/2007 8:59:50 AM PST by
JerseyDvl
(STOP - Hildabeast, Shrillary, Hitlery, Billary, Her Thighness, Sen. Cankles, Dukakis-in-Drag)
To: JRochelle
They know what is expected of them, draw your own conclusion.
101 posted on
03/06/2007 9:00:48 AM PST by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: JRochelle
"It would be a complete miracle if he is found not guilty."
He ain't O.J. Can't resist a chance to put in a dig at the O.J. jury.
105 posted on
03/06/2007 9:01:28 AM PST by
popdonnelly
([Democrats] are jubilant at our disasters and are cast down when the rebels are defeated -Sept. 1862)
To: JRochelle
Justice based on the facts would be nice, but more than likly he will be found guilty on two accounts.
I do think any convictions will be reversed in another court. The prosecution and defense seemed very limited and restricted in favor of guilty verdicts IMO.
128 posted on
03/06/2007 9:03:26 AM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson