Skip to comments.
Verdict in Libby Trial in....reading at noon. (Guilty On 4 of 5 Charges)
MSNBC
Posted on 03/06/2007 8:34:59 AM PST by Dog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,341-1,342 next last
To: traderrob6
I think you're right, but I truly pray you're not. The dictionary should show a picture of this courtroom next to the definition of "travesty of justice."
21
posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:52 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: LYSandra
22
posted on
03/06/2007 8:40:58 AM PST
by
tioga
To: jdm
You know it's going to be "Guilty" -- that's just how things have been going lately.It's a jury of DC residents, one of whom is or was a Washington Post reporter. So if the verdict is not guilty, I will be thoroughly shocked.
23
posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:32 AM PST
by
Wolfstar
("A nation that hates its Horatios is already in grave danger of losing its soul." Dr. Jack Wheeler)
To: Dog
24
posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:37 AM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Dog
I have a bad feeling he is guilty on at least one count of perjury and one of obstruction.
25
posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:39 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: jdm
-it would be a hung jury instead of innocent....I fear a guily verdict as well.
26
posted on
03/06/2007 8:41:58 AM PST
by
tioga
To: PISANO
If Libby is found guilty the VP is the next target!!
&&
You said it!
Prayers.
27
posted on
03/06/2007 8:42:04 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(You are either with us or with the terrorists.)
To: Dog
I wonder if the networks will break from their Anna Nicole Smith coverage...
28
posted on
03/06/2007 8:42:33 AM PST
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Dog
Biggest leftist show trial of an innocent man since Stalin's show trials of the 1930's. An absolute defecation on any concept of justice.
To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
To: traderrob6
This is almost certainly bad news, because if they were deadlocked they have to tell the judge and he has options to tell them to go back and deliberate more or he can question them individually to see if he thinks they are all deliberating in good faith, etc. So I think (but I'm not a lawyer) that a DC jury arriving at a verdict in this case almost certainly means "guilty" on at least some charge(s)..... but we'll all find out in 15-20 minutes!
31
posted on
03/06/2007 8:44:24 AM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
![](http://www.hostfile.com/home/darlene/ping.gif)
Just breaking...
32
posted on
03/06/2007 8:44:30 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: Wolfstar
I bet Chris Matthews is peeing his pants!
33
posted on
03/06/2007 8:44:32 AM PST
by
YaYa123
To: Dog
I was just re-reading firedoglake's account of Fitz's closing remarks, how they were amazed Wells didn't object to all the conspiracy stuff Fitz was throwing at the jury. Jeffress finally objected, but only after the damage was done. I think this was deliberate by the defense. I think they thought was hanging hemself by his own petard. It is prohibited for a prosecutor to present closing remarks based on evidence that wasn't introduced in the trial, and that is EXACTLY what Fitz did.
Fitz was lying when he said he was simply arguing Libby's state of mind. No, he was prejudicing the jury by arguing that a covert agent was outed, that her life was jeopardized, and that this was done because the admin was attacking a critic for exposing its lies about pre-war Iraq intelligence. Fitz had provided no evidence, other than hearsay, for any of this. I think Wells was thinking, "Thank you very much, Fitz."
To: Dog
FREE SCOOTER
FREE SCOOTER
35
posted on
03/06/2007 8:45:04 AM PST
by
Feiny
(I'd rather be rich than stupid.)
To: P-40
"I wonder if the networks will break from their Anna Nicole Smith coverage..."
***
LOL. I doubt it...unless the verdict is guilty.
To: YaYa123
I PRAY that Sissy Chrissy wets his pants.
I would PAY to see that.
37
posted on
03/06/2007 8:45:24 AM PST
by
Txsleuth
(I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
To: jdm
You know it's going to be "Guilty" -- that's just how things have been going lately. I fear you may be right...
38
posted on
03/06/2007 8:45:44 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: Dog
Guilty on one or two lesser counts. Hung on the rest.
39
posted on
03/06/2007 8:45:53 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: the Real fifi; Laverne; onyx; Howlin; SE Mom; Grampa Dave; samadams2000; popdonnelly; ...
LIVE VERDICT AT NOON .. HERE! Praying for justice and relief for Scooter and his family.
40
posted on
03/06/2007 8:46:02 AM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,341-1,342 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson