Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems
http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html ^

Posted on 03/06/2007 3:49:19 AM PST by darkness78

1 France 2 Italy 3 San Marino 4 Andorra 5 Malta 6 Singapore 7 Spain 8 Oman 9 Austria 10 Japan 11 Norway 12 Portugal 13 Monaco 14 Greece 15 Iceland 16 Luxembourg 17 Netherlands 18 United Kingdom 19 Ireland 20 Switzerland 21 Belgium 22 Colombia 23 Sweden 24 Cyprus 25 Germany 26 Saudi Arabia 27 United Arab Emirates 28 Israel 29 Morocco 30 Canada 31 Finland 32 Australia 33 Chile 34 Denmark 35 Dominica 36 Costa Rica 37 United States of America 38 Slovenia 39 Cuba 40 Brunei


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare; rankings; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Hhm! Is WHO an other anti-american organisation?
1 posted on 03/06/2007 3:49:20 AM PST by darkness78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: darkness78

Yes. If nothing else, because it puts your health system below ours here in Britain.


2 posted on 03/06/2007 3:52:00 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

I've been stuck in the waiting area of an ER in London for five hours... there were puddles of pee on the floor. NO WAY are they better than the US.


3 posted on 03/06/2007 3:52:25 AM PST by AirForceBrat23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78
WHO is definitely anti-american. The stats just for Canada alone prove the fallacy of this report. Canada's cancer surival rate is 30% of the USA- fact. The CEO of a company I work with informed me that the majority of his employees and associates now work to pay for private insurance vs. socialized health care. They simply can not get into see specialists for weeks, cancer treatments are delayed for months, etc. I can't imagine why some good honest reporters don't report on the failure of the socialized health care systems around the world.
4 posted on 03/06/2007 3:56:46 AM PST by Faithfull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

I see a lot of people coming from those counties to ours to get care.

WHO can say what it wants but people with money appear to be voting with their feet.


5 posted on 03/06/2007 4:01:31 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

I agree!

IF THE USA'S HEALTH system is so bad then everybody should go to Canada for their health care!


6 posted on 03/06/2007 4:09:19 AM PST by ethics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Faithfull
During my last visit with my doctor, she drifted off into comments about the health systems of Canada and the United Kingdom. They weren't kind remarks, let me leave it at that.

I forget what prompted her comments, but I was surprised; first at her willingness to share them, and second at her obvious fervor.

7 posted on 03/06/2007 4:11:56 AM PST by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

France is #1? You mean the country that can't keep thousands of its own elderly from dying of heatstroke during a summer heat wave? THAT France?

}:-)4


8 posted on 03/06/2007 4:12:30 AM PST by Moose4 (I don't speed in Durham--if I get pulled for 65 in a 55, Mike Nifong'll have me doing 15 to life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

This is trash based on meaningless statistics that don't reflect reality. For example, the WHO definition of neonatal mortality and infant mortality do not take into account the fact that in the US premature babies and babies who are severely ill are aggressively supported and treated. A proportion of these children won't make it, and it reflects on our system, statistically, as an increase in infant mortality. If you had a sick infant, God forbid, what country would you rather be in?

Also, in hospital deaths after aggressive treatment may be higher in the US, but this is because we throw a lot more resources at end of life treatment and critical care. Whether or not we should do this is a topic for in depth discussion, but these types of numbers are not an indictment of the US medical system. It is by far the most advanced medical system in the world.


9 posted on 03/06/2007 4:15:39 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
"France is #1? You mean the country that can't keep thousands of its own elderly from dying of heatstroke during a summer heat wave? THAT France? "

Those who died before making it to the hospital would likely not be reflected in WHO health care statistics. Besides, it's all because of Bush and US induced climate change (sarc).
10 posted on 03/06/2007 4:18:17 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Faithfull

Keep in mind that the United States functions as an adjunct to Canadian socialized medicine, so they can use both systems. It's better for them. :)


11 posted on 03/06/2007 4:19:18 AM PST by sig226 (see my profile for the democrat culture of corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

Just when one thinks they've seen it all, this comes out.

I feel like I'm living in Bizarro world.


12 posted on 03/06/2007 4:20:52 AM PST by Joy in the Journey (Forgiveness: easier to ask for and receive than permission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78
37 United States of America ... 39 Cuba

Heh.

13 posted on 03/06/2007 4:22:23 AM PST by Toskrin (It didn't seem nostalgic when I was doing it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkness78
I'm always suspicious of the "rankings" released by most international organizations. Typically, they'll throw in something about "fairness" or "inequality" to make sure that America is ranked below more collectivist-minded nations. This WHO study is no different. From their report:

In designing the framework for health system performance, WHO broke new methodological ground, employing a technique not previously used for health systems. It compares each country’s system to what the experts estimate to be the upper limit of what can be done with the level of resources available in that country. It also measures what each country’s system has accomplished in comparison with those of other countries.

WHO’s assessment system was based on five indicators: overall level of population health; health inequalities (or disparities) within the population; overall level of health system responsiveness (a combination of patient satisfaction and how well the system acts); distribution of responsiveness within the population (how well people of varying economic status find that they are served by the health system); and the distribution of the health system’s financial burden within the population (who pays the costs).

The majority of their indicators are measures of "fairness", not total health care quality. The U.S. can have the most highly trained doctors, the most advanced medical technology, and the cleanest and most comfortable hospitals...but still rank below a society where the shaman-physicians give the same voodoo to the tribal chief as they do to his subjects.

14 posted on 03/06/2007 4:23:13 AM PST by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faithfull
some good honest reporters

There's your problem, bud. There aren't any in the MSM.

15 posted on 03/06/2007 4:24:42 AM PST by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toskrin

Italy? Italy #2?? My Lord, one should never, repeat never, get sick in Italy. For God's sake they still "bleed" patients. And the only response to most conditions is an injectable with a dirty needle. Italy indeed!!


16 posted on 03/06/2007 4:26:03 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: darkness78

So we're ranked #37?

Is that good enough to get us into the tournament?


17 posted on 03/06/2007 4:30:13 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
Those who died before making it to the hospital would likely not be reflected in WHO health care statistics. Besides, it's all because of Bush and US induced climate change (sarc).

No, as i recall, most of the hospital rooms were not fitted with air conditioners since they apparently dont have that techonology in France, and also most of the hospital workforce was taking their month long vacation for August and wouldnt report back to work even with the rush of heatwave victims.

18 posted on 03/06/2007 4:30:21 AM PST by chudogg (Woof Woof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkness78
During the Rwandas massacres, the WHO was running a seat belt buckle up campaign. Bill boards everywhere, even though the country had few roads, people owned few cars and there was a little problem with hundreds of thousands of people being hacked to death.

WHO headquarters is overlooking a nice lake in Switzerland. it's Administrative budget for reports like this is well over a billion dollars a year. It provides no heath car is is a policy wonk employment project.

It's basically joined at the hip with the UN.

So, to not answer your question. What do you think?
19 posted on 03/06/2007 4:32:43 AM PST by Leisler (REAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS WALK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chudogg

Point taken. Incidentally, I was recently asked by a friend to help him get a portable defibrillator for his father in Germany. He wanted to buy one in the US and send it to his father because the German health care system wouldn't pay for him to have an implantable defibrillator. But their system is better than ours. Just ask the WHO.


20 posted on 03/06/2007 4:36:55 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson