[Fishrrman]

meyer wrote:
Both have the similar goals. One will achieve them much faster.

Let's assume for a moment that this is actually true.

I will also assume that you are a reasonable, logical person.

If your statement is in fact true, would it not be reasonable to chose the one who will get us there more slowly?

If the choice is between sinking quickly or slowly, I would choose "slowly". Certainly better than going down too fast! (laughs)

Having said that, I don't believe that your statement _is_ true on its face. My opinion only.

- John

[supercat]

If your statement is in fact true, would it not be reasonable to chose the one who will get us there more slowly?

If civil war is inevitable, would it not be better to have it occur while most of the people who know what this country is supposed to be about are still alive?

[itsahoot]

If your statement is in fact true, would it not be reasonable to chose the one who will get us there more slowly?

Sort of like one feeding their children to the alligators, in the hopes that they would be eaten last.