Skip to comments.
Rudy Beats Hillary – End of Story
Special to FreeRepublic ^
| 4 March 2007
| John Armor (Congressman Billybob)
Posted on 03/05/2007 6:45:59 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-286 next last
To: Oystir
Even BB didn't say I was wrong.Of course you were.
To: zarf
Or the Ted Haggard evangelical vote.
222
posted on
03/06/2007 12:58:09 AM PST
by
Roy Tucker
("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
To: Oystir
Even BB didn't say I was wrong. He's far too polite for that.
223
posted on
03/06/2007 2:45:38 AM PST
by
wireman
To: Congressman Billybob
I believe that Rudy is ahead of Hillary, but I'm not sure that he or anyone else can beat her. Most of these polls consist of likely or registered voters. Unfortunately, Hillary's going to pick up both unlikely voters & newly registered voters among (young) women. Some will vote for her her just because she's a woman & others due to their continuing educational indoctrination. Of course, I hope I'm wrong.
224
posted on
03/06/2007 2:59:20 AM PST
by
pookie18
([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
To: nutmeg; Congressman Billybob
articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy
225
posted on
03/06/2007 3:44:37 AM PST
by
dinasour
(Pajamahadeen, SnowFlake, and Eeevil Doer.)
To: staytrue
I watched the video and your post is slanderous and taken out of context. Your stupid attempt at character assasination is beneath a conservative and more befitting the CBS NEWS.
The whole quote is "I would like to run on all the lines, the conservative line, the liberal line, I would like to run on the Democratic line if I could figure out how to do it"
LOL! You all are comical. And you're ridiculous to say that video takes him out of context. He's finished because only his PR started him.
226
posted on
03/06/2007 4:41:22 AM PST
by
Vision
("Delight yourself in the Lord; and he will give you your heart's desires." Psalm 37:4)
To: Congressman Billybob
So that's it?
Hemlock or arsenic?
Pardon me if I am not quite ready to drink the Kool-Aid!
To: Mr. Brightside
That "leftist wacko" will support our military and continue the fight against terrorism. That's what counts in my book.
228
posted on
03/06/2007 5:09:13 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: nutmeg
229
posted on
03/06/2007 5:12:14 AM PST
by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: staytrue
Feb 8 2008 is not very early, besides that is the first primary.
Right now all we have are name popularity polls.
Nothing more, they have not even started to address issues, nor have the voters even started to listen.
230
posted on
03/06/2007 5:16:22 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(Rudy would be Very Bad for this country and Very Bad for the Republican Party!)
To: Congressman Billybob
But stick to the observable facts. OK. The fact is I'm not going to support a man whose policies are closer to Clinton than Reagan!
231
posted on
03/06/2007 5:16:53 AM PST
by
airborne
("Why in the hell are we so afraid of being what we are?" HUNTER 2008!)
To: staytrue
Unlike previous years, this time the end comes very early, like Feb 5, 2008.
Heck if you don't have 20-30 mill by labor day your roadkill.
To: TitansAFC
And that's an observable fact.Maybe it's an observalbe fact in your and some other minds posting here, but it obviously isn't an observable fact in my mind and many other minds posting here.
233
posted on
03/06/2007 5:17:42 AM PST
by
billva
To: Congressman Billybob
You've got the right message for the right man for the right job, BB! Carry on....
To: muffaletaman
To: supercat
What's wrong with Mitt Romney?I think (emphasis on THINK, I'm willing to be proven wrong) that he's a phony, and my concern is that he's phony enough to win the nomination and not phony enough to win the general.
To: ApplegateRanch
---If they hold the Gospel very dear, why would they prefer an Cathlolic-in-name-only, serial divorcer, pro-abortion, pro-gay candidate, over an anti-gay agenda, anti-abortion, conservative Mormon??
Are they really that religiously bigoted?---
Certainly, I didn't suggest that they would prefer the G-man. It is interesting, by the way, how many "conservatives" here think that mainline Protestant docrtrine is "religious bigotry".
To: staytrue
Try 3 % which is the current combined polling of "true conservatives" Hunter, Tancredo and Brownback. Is that the same 3% which caused a Republican bloodletting in the 2006 elections?
Anybody with enough functioning brain cells to remember the closeness of the past two presidential elections would not be selling a divisive candidate such as Rudy. Unless, of course, their specific intent is to damage the GOP.
Rudy is such a poor representation of the Republican platform, his nomination would be remembered as the moment that the GOP shot itself in the foot -- with a nuke.
To: popdonnelly
"It's better to win with Guiliani than to lose with a "true conservative", whoever that may be."
How is it better to win with Rudy? When the man you elected treats you the same as the opponent, who do you complain to? You seem to be willing to give up a lot to win...why?
To: Congressman Billybob
Rudy Beats Hillary End of Story Either way, the liberals win. - The REST of the story.
240
posted on
03/06/2007 6:55:17 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(After 20+ LONG years, a REAL conservative I can support 4 President - DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-286 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson