Look, if she doesn't want to have kids, that's fine, but there's no need to form an organization about it, which will inevitably escalate into demanding special rights and privileges. Besides, who'd want to procreate with these broads anyway? These women couldn't get a man if it was closing time at the bar and were the only gals inside of it.
Hey, man, take another look. She looks a lot better than a lot of mothers I've seen. And I am perfectly sober. You're really straining to make a generalization when there is contrary evidence right before your eyes.
Quote: "Look, if she doesn't want to have kids, that's fine, but there's no need to form an organization about it, which will inevitably escalate into demanding special rights and privileges."
But there is a need. Here constant need to convince herself of the big lie that people don't naturally desire children and families. Some people decide not to have children and move on, happy with themselves. Wacked-out liberal freaks like her can't deal with the reality that she missed out on having children and now she has to try to solicit acceptance for that from every individual on the planet. Typical liberal idiocy - screw up and then try to garner praise and acceptance and validation for screwing up.
So it's okay if we don't have kids, as long as we don't look for any friendships with like-minded people, and as long as we are ugly, and as long as we don't date or get married?
What disturbs me about this movement is that they are trying to further devalue parenthood and children. They want to suck away resources for their own selfish selves and basically “steal candy” from babies. It also disturbs me that the guy in the middle of the article said he would acknowledge dogs but would ignore baby strollers. It’s a deliberate and hateful distinction.
I’ve decided to not ever have children but for totally different reasons. I don’t not want to bring a child into a world with people like these.