Skip to comments.
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 4 March 2007
Various big media television networks ^
 | 4 March 2007
 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces
Posted on 03/04/2007 5:03:17 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
 
   
Sunday, March 4th, 2007 
 
 
 Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
 
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network):  Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Reps. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., and Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC):  Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
FACE THE NATION (CBS):  Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.
THIS WEEK (ABC):  Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Trent Lott, R-Miss.; Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad; Sens. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.; Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; news; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 821-839 next  last
To: Mo1
    not sure what Lowery said at the end when he walked off the stage 
 
But they crowd is on their feet clapping and laughing
 
361
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:53:35 AM PST
by 
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
 
To: Morgan in Denver
    Well...the good thing is CNN posts a transcript. 
 
I will be glad to read it..and see if I missed the context...I may have. 
 
362
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:53:49 AM PST
by 
Txsleuth
(I  don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
 
To: MHGinTN
    Thanks, I watch Wallace's Fox show at 6 pm so MTP at 10 pm is doable.One word, just one word (in my best The Graduate movie imitation), TIVO!
:)
 
363
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:54:41 AM PST
by 
Chuck54
(For those who understand the War on Terror, no explanation is needed.)
 
To: Mo1
364
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:55:34 AM PST
by 
Howlin
(Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
 
To: Txsleuth
    He talked about his father's problems and how he left his first wife .. but his put a nice little spin on it 
 
Clinton would have been proud 
 
John Lewis is up now .. he needs a mic - hard to hear
 
365
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:55:54 AM PST
by 
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
 
To: arnoldpalmerfan; Morgan in Denver
    Okay....I heard him wrong. 
 
Thanks for clarifying that. 
 
 
MID..I am sorry, I didn't put Tancredo's words in context.
 
366
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:56:08 AM PST
by 
Txsleuth
(I  don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
 
To: Txsleuth
    Today's rally cry to reve up the voters is evidentally "I'm CRAZY for Obama".
 
367
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:57:18 AM PST
by 
Carolinamom
(Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush  SOTU)
 
To: Carolinamom
    LOL...sounds like it. 
 
"good crazy".
 
368
posted on 
03/04/2007 9:57:54 AM PST
by 
Txsleuth
(I  don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
 
To: Phsstpok
    One of the problems we're having right now is that we've allowed the Dhimmicrats and the media to call this "the Iraq War," and not "the battle of Iraq in the War on Terror." You are not alone, I've harped over this myself.   Repblicans became too defensive with that whole "Mission Accomplished" aircraft carrier event.  We failed to make the distinction between winning the war and now ensuring the continued peace.  The fact is, IMHO, the war in Iraq was won years ago.
 
To: anita
    Two mind-sets: 1. Do what is right regardless of how it benefits you. 2. Do what you can to keep political power 
regardless of whether it is right. 
The Clintons have a record of picking #2 to promote their own political interests, but give us rhetoric they are picking #1. Some voters are easily fooled by an actor who is not really genuine!
 
To: Mo1
    ....all he ever did for them (the blacks) was use them for votes....and that could be said for 99.99% of the Democrats.
 
371
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:02:21 AM PST
by 
Chuck54
(For those who understand the War on Terror, no explanation is needed.)
 
To: snugs
    You are certainly correct on everything you mentioned, and I will go one step further. People do not talk face to face much anymore, and they have forgotten how to communicate. They only know email, text messaging, and any other way they can communicate except face to face. I learned many years ago that when you communicate via anything but personal contact where the person cannot read your facial expressions and body language you can get into a world of trouble without even realizing it. Everything is deemed stronger to the recipient (of any typed message) and that is how fights start on venues like the Freerepublic. People lose control and say things that they would never say in person to the recipient's face. It is so much more than people bore each other today, and do not know how to carry on a face to face conversation, it is that if the person is there in front of them they cannot multitask like you can when you are on the phone or computer with them. People play computer games by themselves now instead of playing Monopoly or Card games with a group having snacks and enjoying each other's company. I hope this makes sense to everyone, it is so obvious to me.
372
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:03:13 AM PST
by 
samantha
(The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
 
To: FreedBird
    Can you imagine the Clintons going back into the W.H. after trashing it for 8 years?They should at least return the silverware. (stole that one)
 
373
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:05:07 AM PST
by 
Chuck54
(For those who understand the War on Terror, no explanation is needed.)
 
To: Txsleuth
    No problem, it happens all the time. Tancredo has become a character fire-starter over the immigration issue, and others, so he knows this happens to him. Tancredo tends to say things without the pandering spin or otherwise in a more softer approach. The on trait Tom Tancredo will not claim is tact.
 
To: Txsleuth
    This man has no more experience to run for POTUS than most of the freepers at FR!!! How could our country do this to itself at this time in our history???
Did you ever see the Peter Sellers movie Being There?  Besides being one of the funniest deadpan performances I've ever seen, it addresses this exact issue in a scathing manner. 
If you haven't seen it I recommend you try to find a copy. 
The twists and turns of the life of it's "writer," Jerzi Kosinski, adds a bit of melancholy, as well as the fact that Sellers died right around the time the film came out.  But it does take on the question you raise.  Basically the conclusion is that there are enough fools who will vote for whoever the press and the power brokers tell them to.  Just look at the 90s for proof of that proposition.
 
375
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:06:04 AM PST
by 
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
 
To: Morgan in Denver
To: Txsleuth
    WOW ... the singing of this song is horrible
 
377
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:06:30 AM PST
by 
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
 
To: Carolinamom
    Just heard Obama speaking. When did he develop a southern-black accent? 
 
To: Mo1
    I MUST have too much time on my hands watching this carp.
 
379
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:08:13 AM PST
by 
AGreatPer
(Be there March 17 (DC).    Support the troops and their efforts.)
 
To: Carolinamom; Howlin
380
posted on 
03/04/2007 10:08:32 AM PST
by 
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 821-839 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson