Posted on 03/04/2007 4:36:21 AM PST by Mia T
IS THE WOMAN WHO HID HILLARY CLINTON'S MAGICALLY APPEARING THESIS GETTING HER ORDERS FROM CLINTON-MACHINE LAWYERS?
|
BACKGROUND:
WHY HILLARY'S MAGICALLY APPEARING THESIS IS LIKE CLINTON'S FOLEY HIT JOB
The means of delivery was MSNBC "investigative" reporter Bill Dedman's scoop, 5 Reading Hillary Rodham's hidden thesis.
The online article announced to the world that ms. rodham's senior thesis, sealed, closed to public scrutiny since 1993 when it was ordered buried by herr hillary decree, was now available in the Wellesley College archives for anyone who cared to read it, (and had been so ever since the clintons left the White House (if not all its furnishings 6)).
7. It is still an open question whether the thesis is THE thesis. As we know, the clintons and their useful-idiot supporters are not beyond altering, redacting, shredding, socking away and otherwise revising the evidence.
|
'KILL BILL'
|
An important question to ask, in light of the Sandy Burglar behavior and the national archives, is whether the now exhibited thesis is the same (no additions or rewrites) manuscript that was sealed in 1993 on orders from her lowness to the named Wellesley administrator. Barbara Olson, in Hell To Pay, identified the thesis as 75 pages, but now we have a dispute as to how many pages Mr. Dedman was given to examine as exhibit of Hillary Rodham-rodent's thesis from 1969.
Considering the copyright law . . . it IS LEGAL
to excerpt and review.
Also, it's legal to discuss such intellectual "scholarly" treatises in professional journals at some length.
Seems to me there are enough FREEPERS to do both:
1. FREEPERS could go to Wellesly and in an organized fashion--take the most potent and damning sentences from say 3-5 pages at a time.
2. LOG THEM IN on FREEPMAIL with Mia-T and maybe Alamo-Girl supervising and rank them in order of most damning to less damning.
3. Then each individual FREEPER amongst however many it took to do a good job of the worst sentences--could quote 1-3 sentences--well within legal copyright excerpting allowed--on an FR thread about the thesis.
FREEPER ATNYS--WOULDN'T BE ANYTHING GRITCH SHRILLERY COULD DO SUCCESSFULLY, WOULD THERE?
4. FREEPERS could find a useful conservative professional political journal. Each Freeper could do essentially the same as above but with paragraphs. Either in letters to the editor or better in another professional journal article critiquing the thesis. She could do nothing--RIGHT, ATNYS???
I think we need to also be contacting Rush and make sure that the thesis released is really the original untampered one. Those Machiavellian traitors would easily and happily replace the original quite against university rules.
Having said that, I wonder if Hillary Clinton ever copyrighted her thesis? Certainly, as an attorney she would have known how to do it.
Did Rush see the original, or this copy, which some have said, has an increased number of pages....
Another thought: If hillary clinton 'revised' the thesis, one thing she would have done is to try to appear prescient. When we read it, let's look for anachronistic slips.
Indeed.
My understanding was that he'd read the original some years ago. But he wasn't interested in being sued.
My SUSPICION is that he used his ample wallet to insure that he got a copy or at least had access to a copy.
Don't we have access to someone on his staff? We should be talking with him earnestly about this, imho.
Her thesis is automatically copyrighted when finished. Certainly when filed at the univ. That's been true for a decade or 3. Doesn't have to have the copyright notice anymore.
I wasn't thinking of organizing to print the whole thing.
Merely of insuring that following the law carefully to avoid her lawyers was done
and
that the most damning parts were excerpted safely, legally.
If one can't follow the law legally, safely, then something is really screwy.
imho, of course.
Thanks, Mia T. Pinging RR; this may be of interest.
btt
Thanks thanks.
BTTT
Lucy, ask him if 'Rush' has a copy of the original, please ... for what it's worth. Barabra Olson's copy will be part of the Ted files moving to the Rudy camp, so if it becomes useful ... well, you get the picture. I want to end this power crazed feminist lesbian wannabe's run for ultimate power, now, before she gains too much mo with the dumbed down masses who vote straight democrap ticket.
Bump for future reading and reference.
We'll need this next year.
Bump for later read. Off to the airport to pick up Mr. RR.
that thesis must really stink, huh. I just don't know how it could stink any worse than the lame excuses and runaround... Good for MSNBC for trying to get at it.
thanks always, Mia. You peel apart all the layers and layers, and tie together the odd loose nuggets of truth. Take care.
Interesting, note post 15 from your link to http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3883a222798a.htm
// To: Ed_in_NJ, BKO
Just a note - I asked BKO about the whereabouts and ownership of the Hillary Wellesley Thesis and she said "I meant to get it out onto a website" after another freeper Doug from Upland got questions through to her on KIEV870 radio. Still waiting.
15 Posted on 04/18/2000 07:30:45 PDT by flamefront //
So sad not to be able to post to BKO... We miss you, Barbara.
Hmmmm, what can we do to put some heat on dear Nan?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.