Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lunch in the White House with George
The Sunday Times ^ | March 4, 2007 | Irwin Stelzer

Posted on 03/04/2007 4:35:57 AM PST by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Most of the troops sent by other countries are staying out of combat, doing support work. When he mentions "heavy lifting", he is talking about combat.


41 posted on 03/04/2007 11:30:39 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

The relationship with Australia is also very strong. The US, UK, and Australia have a very special intelligence relationship.


42 posted on 03/04/2007 11:34:50 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

We really have been lucky to have him these past 7 years. I don't agree with him on everything (who does?) but we really are LUCKY that he's been at the helm versus Kerry or Gore. *SHIVER*

I think History will judge him kindly. Good article. :)


43 posted on 03/04/2007 11:38:59 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I was left with the impression that he is a man comfortable in his own skin; whose religious faith guides him in his search for the good. Unlike his television persona he is a fluent speaker and well read. Ultimately he believes that the president must be “the decider”, and that’s fine with him.

How refreshing. Thanks for posting.

44 posted on 03/04/2007 11:41:18 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63
The problem is I know a lot of moderates who feel the same way about Pres. Bush. I just don't get it.

The media has relentlessly misrepresented who the President is year after year after year. Instead of being skeptical, so many people just eat up anything and everything the Old Media feeds them.

45 posted on 03/04/2007 11:46:48 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Thanks I'm bumping it for later


46 posted on 03/04/2007 11:48:59 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Just when I think the whole world has gone mad you come along and post an incredibly relevant, thoughtful piece of actual journalism. Thank you.


47 posted on 03/04/2007 12:07:56 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Happy Birthday Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Thank you for your kind words regarding our chosen leader....President Bush....may we make as wise a choice with our next leader....Pray for that.


48 posted on 03/04/2007 12:14:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
>>>>>>>>>President Bush is a good man. It's a pity much of the world doesn't know him as well as they should. <<<<<<

Unfortunately, the reason for your pity is due to the fault of our media.

49 posted on 03/04/2007 12:16:01 PM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

^ ^ ^


50 posted on 03/04/2007 12:18:19 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I seldom watch CSpan2's booktv.org programming anymore because they showcase so many liberal authors. But, fortunately last night I turned to that channel in time to see most of the Andrew Roberts segment. (I searched the site but couldn't find online video for that segment; I'm hoping I can catch it again in re-rerun.) ... Roberts did a masterful job of handling the calls from liberals and conspiracy kooks. I especially like how he told one caller how mistaken he was about what constitutes a "fascist."

The reviews for Roberts' book on Amazon are telling as well. Most are articulate along with the typical 1-star rants thrown into the mix. (You can probably guess which ones got my "helpful" vote and which ones got the other kind.) ;)

I wonder if Rush would consider having a Brit as a substitute host? Roberts would do an excellent job!
51 posted on 03/04/2007 12:55:07 PM PST by Fawnn (Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and tshirtcollections.com person - Faith makes things possible, not easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Do not you have any shame to post such stupid post?

You know damned well that Arab terrorists are crossing our leaky borders and that George Bush has blocked any meaningful effort to stop it in direct violation of his oath of office. He signed the legislation to build a fence and then didn't plan any spending in his budget. DOJ and ICE under his "leadership" have done more to intimidate the Border Patrol than drug runners and human traffikers.

If you don't get than then I don't care what you think of it. I'll support a candidate who'll keep the creeps out of the country instead of letting them in and building a police state capable of depriving my liberty supposedly to chase them down.

52 posted on 03/04/2007 1:16:39 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fawnn

I think Rush's subs are all under contract.

The one they use the most is Roger Hedgecock (here in San Diego) who works for another Clear Channel station (KOGO-600). They tried to get Roger to go national for years, but he refused to leave San Diego. Now, he has received a huge contract with Clear Channel .. and subs for Rush - which gives him national exposure. It was a smart move on Roger's part.

I believe the other subs are also a part of Clear Channel. I never listen to them .. I'd rather go home and listen to re-runs of Rush on my computer. I bought an MP3 but I haven't set it up to download Rush's programs yet.

If you do find out Roberts is on CSPAN - please ping me - but realize I'm gone during the day - working.


53 posted on 03/04/2007 1:23:40 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: alnick
The media has relentlessly misrepresented who the President is year after year after year. Instead of being skeptical, so many people just eat up anything and everything the Old Media feeds them.

Absolutely. Many--if not most--Americans would think that feces sandwiches are a delicacy if they read it in the press or see it on TV.

54 posted on 03/04/2007 2:00:50 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Terrorists are not that stupid to risk any operation by crossing illegally via the Mexican borders counting on Jose the coyote to smuggle them in. They are already here "legally" some have US visa, some have US green card and some have US citizenship. Also they will be coming here legally using their EU, Canadian and other passports that do not require a visa to enter the US.

PS: The 9/11 terrorists came here legally and did not cross the Mexican borders.

55 posted on 03/04/2007 2:45:45 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Walter Williams makes a pretty good guest host, too.

BookTV.org is only on CSpan2 from Saturday morning - Monday morning. I've made a note to ping you if I'm lucky enough to catch Andrew Roberts on again.


56 posted on 03/04/2007 4:43:46 PM PST by Fawnn (Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and tshirtcollections.com person - Faith makes things possible, not easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63
But dislike the man? Hate the man?

It's the caricature they hate. Of course, they don't bother to find out that it is a caricature, because it represents so precisely everything they dislike.

But FR has been guilty of the same behavior, many times.

57 posted on 03/04/2007 4:43:50 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Jedi Master Pikachu

"It was not the British who wanted partition, it was Mohammed Ali Jinnah, who demanded an independent Pakistan."

And who do you think was backing Mohammed Ali Jinnah all the way?


58 posted on 03/04/2007 5:07:49 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Bush is smart, and Roberts' suggestions and warnings are dead on.


59 posted on 03/05/2007 11:01:55 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Bush is smart, and Roberts' suggestions and warnings are dead on.


60 posted on 03/05/2007 11:02:45 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson